[tumblindice]

"Kids? You just lead `em less ... " Yeah, won't anyone think of the children? Everyone on this thread can denigrate this gun owner, comparing him to this guy. I've taken flak over open carry (against) and zoning laws (for), but I'm sticking with the gun/property owner/renter here. There are too many concerned, DU-like, "Why does he have to do this, why he can't go to a real gun range?" etc. here. If they neighbors don't like this guy doing something that the police are saying is entirely legal, they can take him to court. Otherwise, they can shut it .... the 2nd Amendment: keystone to the Bill of Rights.

[WayneS]

As long as he is willing to accept personal responsibility for any and all damage he causes to persons and property NOT on his lot, I also support the gun/property owner/renter.

[WayneS]

PS - One more thing - My definition of him accepting personal responsibility extends to what I would do to him if I lived next door and he shot one of my family members while he was exercising his freedom to utilize his ridiculously inadequate “shooting range”.