Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01

Not exactly.

Two issues: first, minimizing the suffering of the innocent is the way to wage just war; second, proportionality is a consideration when targeting and civilians may be hurt.

What is the military gain when compared to the suffering to the innocent. That is a key question that is asked.

Therefore, not all “enemy flagged” ships are a legitimate target.


44 posted on 02/01/2015 6:40:54 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka
Two issues: first, minimizing the suffering of the innocent is the way to wage just war; second, proportionality is a consideration when targeting and civilians may be hurt.

What is the military gain when compared to the suffering to the innocent. That is a key question that is asked

The problem is: how is a submarine commander to determine this? Or, for that matter, a bomber pilot or an artillery officer?

As I recall, every belligerent in WW II operated on the principle of "Unrestricted Submarine Warfare" -- which presumed that an enemy-flagged ship operating in a war zone was carrying military personnel and/or materiel. And, was, thus fair game. The only exception was hospital ships -- which were painted white and adorned with a red cross.

Civilians traveled thereon at their own risk...and were warned accordingly at the ports of embarkation.

At the same time, though, the principle of "Unrestricted Submarine Warfare" was a murky area within the international laws of war. Recall the >Lusitania incident in WW I. For that reason, I recollect that WW II public dispatches never identified submarine captains or crewmen by name.

59 posted on 02/01/2015 7:26:27 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTEAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson