Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kinder Morgan says Freedom Pipeline project is gaining refiner interest
Reuters ^ | 28 Jan 2015 | KRISTEN HAYS

Posted on 01/28/2015 7:05:42 PM PST by shove_it

(Reuters) - Kinder Morgan Inc's (KMI.N) proposed Freedom Pipeline, which would move West Texas crude oil to Southern California, is "getting more interest" from U.S. West Coast refiners, the head of the company's natural gas pipeline unit told analysts on Wednesday.

Unit President Tom Martin said the company "may have a shot" at moving ahead with converting a natural gas pipeline to move crude and condensate to California "if we can get the refiners on board."

The pipeline and logistics company first proposed the $2 billion project in 2012 but shelved it in May 2013 for lack of shipper interest. Martin said on Wednesday that the revamped proposal included adding a facility at the front end in Texas to provide crude blends that better match the Alaska North Slope (ANS) crude that California refineries typically process.

The new proposal also involves shipping ultra-light crude, known as condensate, that could be exported from California, he said during the company's annual analyst meeting...

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: california; energy; oil; pipeline; texas
Update.
1 posted on 01/28/2015 7:05:43 PM PST by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shove_it; thackney

ping


2 posted on 01/28/2015 7:06:49 PM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Why run a pipeline through territory which may soon belong to Mexico? I wouldn’t put it past some La Raza activists to sabotage the pipeline when it is finally completed.

West Texas to a Gulf port for shipping crude would be a better choice, but that is just my humble opinion.


3 posted on 01/28/2015 7:16:33 PM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Refineries on the faults? Let’s think this thru a little. How about the same distance in another direction ! North or east or NorthEast?


4 posted on 01/28/2015 7:17:09 PM PST by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

That too!


5 posted on 01/28/2015 7:18:55 PM PST by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Watermelons’ heads are exploding all over California!
OMG! —— Oil, Pipeline, Big Oil Companies, etc etal.


6 posted on 01/28/2015 7:19:58 PM PST by TaMoDee (Go Pack Go! The Pack will be back in 2015!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Great company...one of the better investments I made.


7 posted on 01/28/2015 7:23:12 PM PST by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The article goes on to say: “In 2013, Kinder Morgan said the project could be revived if shipper interest warranted. Martin said the original proposal to convert the 740-mile (1,190-km) line to move crude and build more than 200 miles (320 km) of new pipe would have moved West Texas oil that did not match the types that West Coast refiners want.”

It sounds like the pipeline is already there and just needs to be converted and extended. I don’t think we’ll be losing any land to Mexico, especially land with a pipeline on it.


8 posted on 01/28/2015 7:26:33 PM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Why run a pipeline through territory which may soon belong to Mexico?

Don't worry Gringo, moonbeam and his environazis will never let a pipeline be built to sabotage!. You see it's contrary to moonbeam and the democraps plan, which is to export wealth and jobs out of California, while importing Latinos as fast as possible

9 posted on 01/28/2015 7:27:31 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

“... I don’t think we’ll be losing any land to Mexico, especially land with a pipeline on it.”

And I never imagined a Muslim Indonesian queer as a U.S. President putting a lock on ANWR oil production!


10 posted on 01/28/2015 7:30:45 PM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

I have some KM, too...


11 posted on 01/28/2015 7:38:40 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Unfortunately, a lot of Kinder Morgan projects are going to be on hold for several months, due to low oil prices.


12 posted on 01/28/2015 9:08:26 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

The refineries already exist and operate. This would just replace some of the oil imported by ships from overseas today.


13 posted on 01/29/2015 12:43:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

Pipeline projects are not dependent on oil prices. They are dependent on the difference in oil prices between locations and the volumes used.

The West Texas prices are further depressed due to the increased production rates from the Permian basin and associated pipeline bottlenecks moving the surplus to markets. Also with lower prices, gasoline consumption is rising.


14 posted on 01/29/2015 12:48:42 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks for your response, thackney. I had just read this article in a local paper (White Mountains, Eastern Arizona), so perhaps I was thinking locally and anecdotally. But, for the residents near to this pipe project, this busted their balloons for sure. The tenor of the article, right or wrong, is that the plug was pulled due to falling oil prices, FWIW.

Kinder Morgan pulls plug on CO2 pipeline
Bob Martinson ­ The Independent | Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2015 5:00 am
ST. JOHNS — The hopes and prayers of most people in Round Valley and St. Johns has been to see
Kinder Morgan’s Lobos CO2 pipeline become a reality in the area.
The Independent has confirmed with Bureau of Land Management’s Lobos Pipeline Project Manager
Mark Mackiewicz that the planned development is dead for now. Kinder Morgan, the nation’s fourth
largest corporation and largest energy infrastructure company in North America, said in a press
release that the project is not cancelled but “delayed for the time being given current market
conditions.”
“The project timing is being reassessed due to current market conditions related to the significant
decline in oil prices. KMI will continue to re­evaluate the timing of its planned investment of
approximately $1 billion to develop the St. Johns source field and construction of the Lobos Pipeline,
as well as the related expansion of the southern portion of the Cortez Pipeline to accommodate future
required CO2 capacity from St. Johns field,” Kinder Morgan said.
After the loss of the pot ash industry after almost becoming a reality, residents of the area have been
counting on a nearly $1 billion investment from the company to build the pipeline which was to have
originated from between St. Johns and Springerville and would have traveled across New Mexico,
connecting with an existing line into Texas.
That dream is now being “tabled,” according to an email from Kinder Morgan to the BLM manager
who had only about six weeks remaining before an environmental impact statement was to be
completed on the project.
On Jan. 23, Kinder Morgan announced that, as the next step, it has withdrawn its application for U.S.
Bureau of Land Management right­of­way review for the proposed Lobos Pipeline.
“Withdrawal of the pipeline right­of­way application for the time being will allow us time to
complete the reassessment of the overall project, and we have the option of moving forward with the
application process once we complete our reassessment,” said Jesse Arenivas, CO2 president.
“We have not cancelled the Lobos Pipeline Project, but rather delayed it for the time being given
current market conditions, and Kinder Morgan will continue limited activity in the St Johns source
field. We remain committed to expanding the supply of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery projects and
believe that over the long­term, the markets will support such projects.”
“It’s just devastating news for this area,” said Doyel Shamley, a local resident who was working with
BLM on the environmental assessments. “All those employees that would have been renting or living
in hotels here, the food they would have purchased and who knows how much money would have1/29/2015 Kinder Morgan pulls plug on CO2 pipeline ­ White Mountain Independent: Premium News
http://www.wmicentral.com/news_premium/kinder­morgan­pulls­plug­on­co­pipeline/article_bc8d0542­a5ba­11e4­a549­371784cd0ee0.html?mode=print 2/2
been spent on supplies to keep their equipment running. It would have all been purchased here.”
Shamley was upset with the fact that the EIS was almost complete.
“They just sent out an email saying it was being tabled,” Mackiewicz said. “I told the company that
they had better put out a press release right away, because we’re going to, letting people know that
their jobs are done. I was really counting on seeing this thing go through.”
Mackiewicz said he was sympathetic to the St. Johns and Round Valley area and knew what it meant
to the local economy. He speculated that the company’s latest acquisition of another company,
Hiland Partners, might not have had a lot to do with it but said the drop in oil prices may have had
something to do with the company’s “evaluating this project and restructuring their plans from
strictly an economic standpoint.”
Kinder Morgan confirmed that statement later Friday evening. Kinder Morgan has been restructuring
since last August and has completed many recent transactions as a result. The purchase of the other
pipeline was announced in the most recent issue of Fortune Magazine.
Reach the reporter at bmartinson@wmicentral.com


15 posted on 01/29/2015 5:11:52 AM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
Key words in the first sentence CO2 pipeline This is used to expand oil production. Not a growing demand in the current prices of oil.

That is far different market from all their other pipelines. CO2 is a tiny part of their business. It would be like talking about the business of a single, little spur line that served a single specialty manufacture, while discussing a national railroad system.

Read this article for a better perspective of the whole company rather than a single pipeline.

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2015/01/28/kinder-morgan-charts-course-for-growth-despite-headwinds/

16 posted on 01/29/2015 5:18:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks again for the dialogue. That FuelFix is quite a great looking trade paper!


17 posted on 01/29/2015 5:35:27 AM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Great company...one of the better investments I made.

My thoughts up to now too. However, I am afraid those lovely yields are going to start dropping now that the partnership has devolved into a corporate entity. I still think based on my original price point, it will still retain it's "slot machine atm" status.

18 posted on 01/29/2015 5:41:50 AM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

I prefer MLPs, REITS, etc. where the payout is mandated beyond a certain point. There are too many CEO’s with bright ideas that have destroyed value or even taken the company down to bankruptcy (Enron, Baldwin United, Borden, etc.).


19 posted on 01/30/2015 3:56:21 PM PST by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson