Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll

The article goes on to say: “In 2013, Kinder Morgan said the project could be revived if shipper interest warranted. Martin said the original proposal to convert the 740-mile (1,190-km) line to move crude and build more than 200 miles (320 km) of new pipe would have moved West Texas oil that did not match the types that West Coast refiners want.”

It sounds like the pipeline is already there and just needs to be converted and extended. I don’t think we’ll be losing any land to Mexico, especially land with a pipeline on it.


8 posted on 01/28/2015 7:26:33 PM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: shove_it

“... I don’t think we’ll be losing any land to Mexico, especially land with a pipeline on it.”

And I never imagined a Muslim Indonesian queer as a U.S. President putting a lock on ANWR oil production!


10 posted on 01/28/2015 7:30:45 PM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson