Posted on 01/28/2015 6:16:06 PM PST by Reverend Saltine
IN order to internalize the grave danger America is in – relative to the injection of Shariah Law - one must first recognize why ANY semblance of Shariah Law implanted within America is a clear and present danger. Civil, criminal, Shariah financing laws…makes no diff.
SPECIFICALLY, the Muslim Brotherhood’s overall plan is to subsume all of America under the boot of Shariah, not “just” the Muslim community. They are deadly serious, and their track record attests as much. Don’t dare to dismiss their American (and global) designs.
AT its base, Shariah Law is a knock out blow (despite protestations to the contrary, ala Islamists and anti-American leftists) to the U.S. Constitution, the law of the land.
Shari’a is an Arabic word meaning “path” or “way.” Today the term is used most commonly to mean “Islamic law,” the detailed system of religious law developed by Muslim scholars in the first three centuries of Islam and still in force among fundamentalists today.
Perry’s running for Pres. now...so you better believe how he ran his state regarding his friendliness and support of Muslims in his state we’ll see also in the Whitehouse if he gets it.
I recently heard on talk radio that there is no one and no way to slow or stop the take over in Europe, but there is a chance that it could be stopped in the USA.
I heard that there are more than 500 no-go zones in France. A "no go" zone is such because the culture, borders, and language are Muslim Sharia Law. This is a convenience for the French because they no longer have to police those areas. Only to protect fire fighters from being hurt by the local citizens when they have to take their equipment into a "no go" zone to put out a fire.
Hopefully Europe can save itself before it is too late, but it is already unstoppable, especially with their atheist socialist government, low birth rate.
Because she scribbled a few simplistic and poorly crafted paragraphs about commonly-known things?
My standards are a bit higher.
Oh really. Suggest you brush up on sharia law.
Please explain how sharia law is "binding" in courts (short of a takeover by the muslims), or becomes primary authority over and above US law, when used against US citizens? Wouldn't that be like the Russians (or any other country) attempting to enforce their laws within our borders on us?
I don’t really believe that there is much chance of a President Perry.
The whole argument here is incoherent.
Sharia law rulings are binding on devout Muslims, as rabbinic court rulings are for devout Jews, or canon law rulings for devout Catholics.
But none of them have any mechanism other than peer pressure by the in-group to enforce their rulings.
That is of course what defines “law,” that if those involved refuse to accept the ruling, it is enforced.
> Please explain how sharia law is “binding” in courts (short of a takeover by the muslims), or becomes primary authority over and above US law, when used against US citizens? Wouldn’t that be like the Russians (or any other country) attempting to enforce their laws within our borders on us?
I was merely posting what the blogger posted. Sharia law could only be binding if the Muslims took over and abolished The Constitution and declared sharia law the new law of the land. In other words only if we “allowed” it or were overcome by military might. Of they might do it a region at a time. I have a feeling Soros and his mini-Me fully endorse it.
Bookmarking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.