Yep. That’s the exact type of thing young and swing voters on this topic point to when debating. We argue a moral position, the libs shout about things like Newt and Rush’s multiple wives, and suddenly the whole argument is screwed.
It’s frustrating.
When you accept that examples of someone failing to achieve the standard invalidates the standard,
you have lost.
You are “answering a fool in his folly”.
Address his folly - “Does any example of anyone failing to abide by a standard invalidate the standard?”