Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HMS Surprise; AlaskaErik
I guess I’m gullible. I always thought that conservatives were interested in the Constitution. Evidently not.

Still falsely pushing your opinion as Constitutional Law?

Please provide the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant sections of U.S. Federal Law that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

You won't because you can't because they don't exist anywhere except in your mind and in sources that are not legal or constitutional in nature.


CRUZ or LOSE!


62 posted on 01/25/2015 10:21:28 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Copy and paste... All that matters is: What was the defintion of “natural born” when the Constitution was written. Your ridiculous legal constructs are just dumb.


67 posted on 01/25/2015 11:09:24 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson