The author does not mention reading the comments to the editorials.
Interestingly, most regular readers and commenters of the NY Times do not drink the Kool-Aid. Krugman probably has the biggest fan club, but at least half the comments say he is an idiot and don’t know what he is talking about. For Blow, Kristoff, and Friedman, it is more like 75%. It must be discouraging for liberals if their core audience no longer supports them.
“It must be discouraging for liberals if their core audience no longer supports them.”
So If I understand you correctly, NY liberals have been “inbreeding” (not unlike their Muslim “brothers”) for so long that they have succeeded in driving down their IQ’s into at least the double digit range, thereby abolishing any “powers of discernment” they may have ever had. Is that it?
Here are some examples, and they are just for this month
I think the reason that LIBERALS tend to appear to have the upper hand is because they control the PA system and the microphone.
Simply put: They have been put in the select positions to expound their LIBERAL LUNACY thus making it appear they're POV is much stronger and dominate than it actually is.
Most of these people fall into a very simple category:
"There are those who do not know and think they do."