As I said, it doesn't matter for the following reasons:
1. Terri NEVER HAD ONE, nor was there ever any evidence that she ever did.
2. Even if she did have one, Florida law in 1990 didn't provide for the termination of nutrition and hydration.
3. Terri wasn't dying, Florida law in 1990 didn't provide for killing the disabled.
4. The idea that Terri wanted to be killed WASN'T MENTIONED in the malpractice trial. It was only AFTER the money was awarded that Mikey "recalled" her talking about wanting him to murder her.
All I want to know is, in general, do you believe an individual has a right to specify what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves?