Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121

It wouldn’t be effective in against an enemy that has good anti-aircraft coverage.


12 posted on 01/21/2015 12:50:29 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
It wouldn’t be effective in against an enemy that has good anti-aircraft coverage.

It was designed to effectively attack Soviet tanks in an environment defended by these:

Radar-sighted quad-23mm cannon.

88 posted on 01/21/2015 6:15:34 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

It was designed to go up against the Soviets, and theirvADA wasn’t something to be ignored.

An F-16, mud hen, or F-35 would have been turned into a flaming ball of wreckage instead of RTB with this sort of damage:
http://warthognews.blogspot.com/2011/06/from-archives-10-80-0258-from-172nd.html?m=1

There was the A-10 flown by Capt Kim Campbell that was shot up over Iraq and was able to RTB with no hydraulics.

There was another from Desert Storm that had a huge hole blown through the wing that again the pilot was able to RTB.


102 posted on 01/22/2015 7:40:30 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Je suis Charlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson