Posted on 01/20/2015 10:14:27 PM PST by Mozilla
CNNs Max Foster interviewed Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal over the weekend. He grilled Jindal on so-called no-go zones.
Pay attention to what Jindal actually said, as documented by CNN.
Jindal was also unable to offer examples during an earlier interview with CNNs Max Foster, saying that hes heard from folks here that there are neighborhoods where women dont feel comfortable going in without veils We all know that there are neighborhoods where police are less likely to go into.
I think that the radical Left absolutely wants to pretend like this problem is not here. Pretending its not here wont make it go away, he told Foster.
Pressed for details, Jindal said only I think your viewers know absolutely there are places where the police are less likely to go.
And asked whether that feeling may be caused by high crime rates, rather than the Muslim population in the area, Jindal said, This isnt a question.
This was all based on a speech Gov. Jindal made to the Henry Jackson Society in London about the so-called no-go zones, which is not Jindals own designation for the areas, but what is used in common parlance in London. Jindal told the society, In the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home.
Max Foster of CNN acted like he had never heard of such a thing and, in fact, seemed downright insulted by the idea that there might be areas of muslim population where men try to impose sharia law on the local population.
Turns out CNN has run a report on just such an area. And, it was in London.
Perhaps Max Foster should watch his own network. Or maybe he should read the Gatestone Institute report that documents no-go zones in Europe and, in particular, France. In fact, theres a 2,200 page report on French no-go zones that copiously documents their existence.
lol
French TV channel TF-1 aired a 90-minute documentary on “No-Go Zones”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7L3JAfnsNo
French Channel TV3 had a 50-minute documentary on them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7L3JAfnsNo
BS. I drove through it yesterday. Nice town. Used to work there.
>> CNN caught lying.
Sure, but here’s the problem: if Jindal can’t enumerate the exact regions, then Jindal should keep his mouth shut.
Conservatism is about facts, not generalities nor hearsay.
Bump
..."no-go zones," which is not Jindal's own designation for the areas, but what is used in common parlance in London. Jindal told the society, "In the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home." Max Foster of CNN acted like he had never heard of such a thing..."Acted" s/b "pretended".
Years ago I was monitoring an asbestos abatement in a pretty rough neighborhood.
an African American police officer came up to me and asked "What is a white boy doing in this neighborhood?"
I showed him my credentials explained why I was there and he made a drive by every 15-20 minutes for the 2+ hours I was there.
Something REALLY WEIRD happened here.
Anyone following Europe knows that there are Sharia Courts that have been granted at least some legal authority in their host country (i.e., they may not be chopping off hands yet, but don’t even bother fighting for custody of your kids if you’re a Muslim woman looking to divorce your abusive husband). And yes, with the courts there are definitely places where women wouldn’t do too well wearing a bikini on the streets...and cops have to drive in unmarked cars, or they won’t make it out alive.
And yes, we have bad areas in the US, but we don’t have “African American Courts” that I know of, and cops still can drive marked cars into those areas. White women in bikinis - not so sure...but their problem in those areas is not the dress code.
Yet PEOPLE WENT NUTS to deny their existence? Why?
It will be so easy for Jihadists to draw these liberal morons into ambushes and traps and eliminate them.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"Whitey" is the new "Nigger", and soon "Conservative" will be the new "Juden".
And according to NASA who said 2014 was the HOTTEST YEAR EVER... It beat the previous record by .004 degrees Celsius.
They START the records from the year 1880, BTW. So, the Earth has been around for 4 billion years or so... They’ve only been officially recording the global temperature for 134 years... And the increase is .004 degrees over the previous record (of only 134 of 4 billion YEARS).
I do believe in science. I understand its importance and applaud scientific, fact-based research. I even believe the climate has changed and is changing; there is no ideal temperature of the Earth... But I do debate whether or not mankind is at fault of the recent barely perceivable rise in global temperature over the past 5 decades.
While we can come up with a pretty good idea of what the temperature was for thousands, even millions of years by using ice core chemical and isotope analysis, tree rings, etc, it will never be as accurate as .004 degrees and not global, but rather regional, but this announcement of HOTTEST YEAR EVER is taken as gospel by the Left in all it’s “OMG we’re all going to die!” glory.
Yup. That certainly justifies trillions of dollars of new taxes to big government and draconian laws that hurt industry and commerce.
Brings to mind Al Gore’s so called “popular vote” victory in 2000. He was up by 0.51% (half a percentage point) so far inside the margin of error that it is meaningless without a national recount. His victory didn’t even include the 3,000 (and supreme court approved) contested military ballots.
His “victory” statistic is meaningless and possibly inaccurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.