Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Juan McLame is an idiot. ""Its immediate impact would be a reduction in the number of ships built in U.S. shipyards, which would result in a loss of jobs, a loss of industrial knowledge and skills, and a loss in America's edge in shipbuilding quality and technology," the league said in a statement. "This would mean all ships used by our U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard — which of course will be built in the United States — would have a higher cost per ship due to increased overhead costs, and would have a less reliable industrial base."
1 posted on 01/17/2015 5:19:21 AM PST by outofsalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: outofsalt

We could buy our maritime assets from the Chinese, along with everything else, I suppose.


2 posted on 01/17/2015 5:21:09 AM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

We’re shipping the rest of our industrial base overseas. Why not ship building too?


3 posted on 01/17/2015 5:22:43 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

Impeach McCain for this, and bring back American jobs.

Sell-out.


4 posted on 01/17/2015 5:24:26 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

“It costs six dollars per barrel to move crude from the Gulf Coast to the Northeast United States on a Jones Act tanker, while a foreign-flag tanker can take that same crude to a refinery in Canada for two dollars per barrel”

Is this true?


5 posted on 01/17/2015 5:26:24 AM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

6 posted on 01/17/2015 5:27:14 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

I swear John McCain is the original Manchurian Candidate.

Everything he does is to weaken this nation while appearing to do the opposite.


7 posted on 01/17/2015 5:28:50 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

Do everything in your power to increase the cost of manufacturing in America. What happens after that is not rocket science.


8 posted on 01/17/2015 5:30:12 AM PST by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

Simply lower the federal tax on gas. Oil companies meka 2 - 4 cents per gallon profit. Taxes are as high as .60 per gallon. Maybe higher That doesn’t make sense...does it?!


9 posted on 01/17/2015 5:30:21 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

It’s not like we’ve exported practically every manufacturing job overseas since after the end of WWII.

Manufacturing is the key area of the economy that actually generates more wealth rather than a service jobs that only moves it around a bit.


11 posted on 01/17/2015 5:32:36 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt
US oil exports to Canada are at record levels and for several years sweet light shale oil from the Eagle Ford in Texas has been shipped by boat to refineries in Quebec to replace the imported Brent Crude which is expensive. There is also demand for this sweet light crude on the US west coat.

This is really what the Trans-Canada pipeline is about. Import Tar sands oil from Alberta to be refined on the gulf coast, freeing up the sweet light shale oil for export.

Meanwhile, there are large amounts Bakken shale oil moving by rail to both the east and west coasts.

Export baby export.

15 posted on 01/17/2015 5:39:10 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

EXEMPT McCain is always looking out for
HIMSELF (above the Law, of course, like the other EXEMPT)
and the “rebels” that he turned into ISIS with Obola.


16 posted on 01/17/2015 5:41:25 AM PST by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

besides killing American shipbuilding industry, another aspect of Jones Act I believe requires 75% of the crew to be American citizens.

now we know what jobs all those somali immigrants will be given.....


18 posted on 01/17/2015 5:43:01 AM PST by oldmomster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt
You know that slimy sell out rat McCain will get paid bribe money too. Remember too this is the U.S. Senator that collaborated with Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

I don't know about you but it sure feels like our government NO LONGER represents the American People, but SELL OUTS to the highest bidders.

unfortunately most of the highest bidders tend to be foreign governments. The U.S. Constitution is nothing but a pain is thorn to them.

19 posted on 01/17/2015 5:43:24 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt
The money phrase here is "Juan McLame is an idiot."

Not only was he the worst candidate the GOP has had since I can recall, but he would have made a terrible president. I seriously don't think we would have been an better off had this mental case won the White House in 2008 instead of Obama. He snuggles up to the left so often that it is hard to tell whether he's a democRAT or not.

Best evidence yet that we need term limits for some of these old fogies that can't think clearly.

22 posted on 01/17/2015 5:48:27 AM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

-— “This would mean all ships used by our U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard — which of course will be built in the United States — would have a higher cost per ship due to increased overhead costs, and would have a less reliable industrial base.” -—

A higher cost per unit for the military doesn’t justify protectionism, since higher transportation costs also come out of taxpayers pockets. But “a less reliable industrial base,” which could not be quickly converted to war-time usage, could be a justification for some degree of protectionism.


26 posted on 01/17/2015 5:55:10 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt
I agree that many of the provisions of the Jones Act are essential, but some of them make no sense in today's economy and today's shipping industry. Shipping a container from Los Angeles to Honolulu costs ten times more than shipping the same container to China -- which is ridiculous when you consider that a ship taking a container to China passes Hawaii on the way. There are a number of factors here in this price discrepancy, but the Jones Act requirements for U.S.-made and U.S.-flagged vessels for the Hawaii trip is a big part of it. This is why the Congressional delegations of Hawaii and Alaska are among the strongest proponents for some revisions to the Jones Act.

I believe it makes sense to limit the Jones Act to transport along the internal waterways of the U.S. Beyond that, there's no practical reason to restrict domestic shipping in a way that doesn't apply to international shipping. What exactly does the U.S. gain by forcing a shipper to use an American-made and American-flagged ship and American crew for a trip from New Orleans to New York if there is no such restriction for a trip from Saudi Arabia to New York?

28 posted on 01/17/2015 5:59:54 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

Not really news, just about everything this clown has done his entire career has been against American Interests.


30 posted on 01/17/2015 6:07:36 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

Sorry, but this is a tough call for me. I can see the strategic importance of the Jones Act...as it’s tough to be a world superpower if you don’t have any ships in your name.

On the other hand, try taking a cruise from New York to Miami, for example. You CANNOT. I mean you could, but the ship would have to comply with the Jones Act, and thus be priced out of the range of its market...so no company does that...and hence no cruise options. Same for Alaska - you can certainly take a ship from Vancouver (Canada) to Alaska (international trip and thus Jones compliant), but you cannot take one from Seattle to Alaska, as the Seattle to Alaska ship would have to comply with the Jones Act, but not the Vancouver ship - so you have the pain in the butt of having to go to a foreign land (without gun rights or free speech) and also deal with customs twice, just to get around the Jones Act.

So maybe a compromise - lift the Jones Act for cruise ships, since it isn’t doing US shipping any good, anyway, but keep it for other shipping - for strategic interests.


40 posted on 01/17/2015 6:34:12 AM PST by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

and you just know that some crony capitalist lobbyist came up with this


41 posted on 01/17/2015 6:36:10 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

First, how many ship ports exist in Arizona?

Second, is the Jones Act protecting bloated, union jobs that contribute to Democrats?

Third, we should not protect industries with mandates like this. If foreign competition has an unfair advantage, their goods should have a tariff imposed. Anything else is unconstitutional nonsense.


45 posted on 01/17/2015 7:25:53 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson