Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969; Kaslin

Constitutional scholars are requested to reply.

Does the US Consitution provide for SCOTUS review of the “implementation decisions” of the Executive Branch?

I understand that the SCOTUS is tasked, according to the Constitution to determine whether Congress’ actions/legislation align with the Constitution.

Wherein do we find the requirement for the SCOTUS to make determinations regarding the implementation actions of the executive branch?

To wit, I would request citations where the SCOTUS can remand/reverse an executive branch decision to summarily disregard, in part or in whole, the legislative creations outside of the Veto Pen? I am specifically concerned with Obamugabe’s selective ignoring of legally passed immigration law.

From where I stand, SCOTUS can remand/reverse legislative actions but cannot make decisions on Executive Branch actions. Yes or no?

...and is this where Obamugabe rests his current actions?


12 posted on 01/16/2015 9:04:08 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Even if the court did make some ruling, theOne would use the opportunity to channel his own Andrew Jackson impression, “John Robert’s has made his ruling, now let him enforce it. “


27 posted on 01/16/2015 12:40:35 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson