As long as the Conservatives coalesce around one, while the RINO’s fight over the Muffy-and-Biff Country Club, pinky-sticking-out-when-sipping-vin, favor-slaughtering-babies-because-folks-protesting-for-life-are-so-gauche Vote, I’ll be happy.
CRUEL: Huckabee,Rubio
CCC: Jindal
Reagan was a RINO - he cut and ran from Lebanon, amnesty to illegals, and raised taxes. In the eyes of conservatives, HE’S NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
Jesus was a RINO - he consorted with prostitutes, advocated paying taxes, and forgave them their debts. In the eyes of conservatives, HE’S NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
So, why will Bishop Willard of the Dauphin Bush be considered in 2016?
Because in the case of every conservative candidate, the cry rings out: “HE’S NOT GOOD ENOUGH”.
In the words of Chuck Schumer: “We’re united - you’re not.”
And never will be.
What would George Washington say, after all the sacrifice of the revolution?
Just asking.
IMHO
Strap in. This is gonna get bumpy!
CCC: Palin
An excellent article. Thanks for posting it.
Scott Walker
I'm in the CCC category. A candidate from any othe category would lead to another Republican loss. Off the triple-C's Carson's a joke, Bolton is slightly less of a joke, Walker I could live with but he's not my first choice and Pence isn't running. That leaves the most obvious choice by a wide margin - Ted Cruz.
One more interesting take on Walker:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/scott-walker-the-un-academic/article/2558544
“...............Our best-known academics today are Obama, Jonathan Gruber, and Hillary — who as Hillary Rodham made Life magazine as her class valedictorian, and who had been told by her teachers that SHE should be president, long before Bill had arrived on the scene. With this in mind, Walker should wear his state proudly. He could win by acclaim as as the un-academic. Run, Scotty, run!”
“CCCs: Cruz, Carson, Pence, Walker, Bolton.”
Sorry but I’d have to put Carson in the CRUEL’s and Bolton who I used to like is a NEOCON.