[canuck_conservative]

It seems odd to me that 15 plus accusers can’t seem to come up with a shred of evidence, other than their unsworn, un cross examined statements.

Just like the Clinton accusers in '92, right?

Why did they wait until then to speak up? "If it was something as serious as sexual assault or rape, surely they would have reported it to the cops at the time, so they're obviously lying."

Ergo, Bill Clinton must be innocent.

Yeah we've seen this logic before.

[mylife]

Until the dress there was no proof.
Doofus Monica had the evidence and still did not want to bring it forward.
I Get all that, but these women have no evidence, just nattering whining and empty charges.

[Above My Pay Grade]

I didn’t say he must be innocent. I said there is no evidence he is guilty. If I claimed you drugged and raped me 10 years ago but provided no evidence that I even ever met you, I never filed a police report and couldn’t even say the date, do you think it would be fair for everyone to assume you are guilty?

When and if I see some strong, corroborating evidence I will believe he is guilty.