Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1 million tons of pressurised CO2 stored beneath Decatur, Illinois
WattsUpWithThat.com ^ | 14JAN2015 | Eric Worrall

Posted on 01/14/2015 8:44:01 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine

7000 ft below the city of Decatur, Illinois, population 74,710 people, is a high pressure reservoir which contains 1 million tons of CO2.

From the press release:

"One of the largest carbon sequestration projects in the U.S., the Illinois Basin – Decatur Project (IBDP) has reached its goal of capturing 1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide and injecting it deep underground in the Mount Simon Sandstone formation beneath Decatur, Illinois. The project is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of carbon capture and storage. IBDP director Robert Finley talked about the million-ton milestone with News Bureau physical sciences editor Liz Ahlberg. Finley is director of the Advanced Energy Technology Institute at the Illinois State Geological Survey, part of the Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois."

The reservoir has been created to demonstrate the viability of carbon sequestration – capturing large quantities on carbon, to prevent the CO2 from being emitted into the atmosphere.

The University of Illinois scientists responsible for this demonstration project assure us that the reservoir does not pose a safety threat. According to a University of Illinois press release;

“Extensive monitoring takes place during and after injection to be sure the stored CO2 stays in place. Monitoring techniques include using geophysical technology to confirm the position of the CO2 underground and wells to monitor groundwater and soils.

No out-of-bounds health, safety or environmental risks were observed from this properly designed and managed storage site. Appropriate risk mitigation and management plans were an integral part of the overall project planning. Extensive monitoring took place before, during and now after the injection to be sure the CO2 stays in place. The first line of monitoring begins deep below the ground, so we know if any leakage occurs long before any CO2 might reach the surface.”

http://illinois.edu/emailer/newsletter/65417.html

They’re probably right – when you create a demonstration project, a showpiece for what you hope will become a lucrative business, you want to make sure nothing goes wrong. I’m sure that elaborate precautions have been taken to prevent any possibility of adverse news, in the hope that this reservoir will be the first of many.

However, as the scientists responsible for the project admit, a serious carbon sequestration effort will need to store a lot more than a million tons of CO2. “… One million tons is scalable in its behavior to the 3 million tons that would be emitted annually from a typical medium-sized, coal-fired power plant. …”

If just one of those proposed sequestration projects suffers a major containment breach, say if an earthquake cracks the geological structure, or if a mistake or greed leads to the reservoir being overloaded, the result could be a disaster.

In Africa, in 1986, an abrupt release of an estimated 100,000 – 300,000 tons of CO2 killed 2,500 people up to 25km (15.5 miles) from the source of the release.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos#1986_disaster

A similar release near a major city would kill a sizeable fraction of the city’s population. The region of devestation was comparable to the loss of life which would be caused by a large nuclear explosion – the only reason a lot more people didn’t die, was Lake Nyos is a sparsely inhabited rural region.

The Lake Nyos CO2 release was so deadly, because CO2 is heavier than air – when the huge CO2 cloud boiled out of lake Nyos, it hugged the ground, displacing all breathable air to an elevation 10s of ft above ground level, suffocating almost everyone in its path.

Its not just people and animals which would be affected – car engines would also stall, as the blanket of CO2 choked off the supply of oxygen.

If carbon sequestration becomes commonplace, sooner or later someone will get greedy and careless, and will be careless in their choice of geological reservoir, and / or will overload their geological reservoir to boost their bottom line. And that carelessness will, in my opinion, almost inevitably lead to a catastrophic loss of life.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: carbon; carboncapture; co2; decatur; illinois; sequestration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: KoRn

They probably don’t even need to drill a hole in the ground - just blow up some valves.


61 posted on 01/14/2015 10:06:41 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

OH CRAP! I live in Decatur, and never heard of this. Does it have to do with ADM? Guess I better find out what is going on!!


62 posted on 01/14/2015 10:20:22 AM PST by vickixxxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: vickixxxx
You should also check to see if they have any plans to divert some of the CO2 into the local water supply and charge you for the equivalent of Perrier.

Anything to increase taxes you know.

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

63 posted on 01/14/2015 10:28:35 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Extensive monitoring

Yeah, that works so well with terrorist lists and Ebola.

64 posted on 01/14/2015 10:36:00 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

That was one of my first thoughts too.

Not to mention that if we could capture all the Co2 then plant life would all die.


65 posted on 01/14/2015 10:36:27 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Oh No! It is ADM, and they have started another carbon capture area. They are going to store up to 5 million metric tons. Will cover some of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky. Another reason to leave Illinois!!

http://herald-review.com/news/local/adm-carbon-capture-reaches-million-metric-tons/article_0b2711c9-d969-5f1b-a83c-e3787763bc59.html


66 posted on 01/14/2015 10:38:10 AM PST by vickixxxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Very true.


67 posted on 01/14/2015 10:54:03 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
That would put the fizz in a lot of sodas and beer.

It might make well water nice and fizzy.

68 posted on 01/14/2015 11:08:41 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Why you gotta bring the pyramids in this? For investment:time they’re still around, I think they were a pretty good model of building something that will last.


69 posted on 01/14/2015 11:09:33 AM PST by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

That would be one hell of a pipeline; from Decatur, Illinois to a jungle


70 posted on 01/14/2015 11:11:01 AM PST by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: arbitrary.squid
That would be one hell of a pipeline; from Decatur, Illinois to a jungle.

I was talking in general terms, not necessarily *that* stash.
Curious, what was the energy cost of capturing and pumping down all that CO2? How much extra CO2 did that effort generate?

71 posted on 01/14/2015 11:22:09 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Its not just people and animals which would be affected – car engines would also stall, as the blanket of CO2 choked off the supply of oxygen.

WTF? Who gives a shi'ite? People and animals are dead or dying

What an odd addition to an article... reporter must have been getting paid per word.

72 posted on 01/14/2015 11:28:41 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
I have about 2 lbs of pressurized SO2 that I need to get rid of. Don't know if I could make it to Decatur...

5.56mm

73 posted on 01/14/2015 11:31:14 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
What sized earthquake would it take to cause a catastrophic release of CO2? With Magic Thinking so ingrained now in American minds at all levels of society, are we convinced that the 'scientists' behind this endeavor have actually considered that their process is flawed if the planet decides to burp? I don't trust these bastards for a second, given their track record on globull warming and hockey sticks ...
74 posted on 01/14/2015 11:39:24 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Actually, the priestly class had the Pyramids built to be power generators, but that little secret is still held in confidence so the ruling elites don’t allow we peons to get any ideas.


75 posted on 01/14/2015 11:41:09 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

As will be clear if you keep reading, I’m no chemist. Is there a reasonably inexpensive way to liberate the O2 from this and store the carbon? I personally don’t think there’s any need to sequester a vital plant food like CO2 but if someone wants to lock up carbon, I suspect the real danger is the gas pressure.


76 posted on 01/14/2015 11:44:11 AM PST by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

A bunch of cronies mounting a business model to take advantage of politically biased science. Next phase of “development” will be the lobbying for the laws to demand the required use of their new business.


77 posted on 01/14/2015 11:52:33 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Know any ways to convert carbon dioxide into methane?


78 posted on 01/14/2015 11:53:40 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Give it a look:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/11/remodeled-enzyme-converts-carbon-dioxide-into-methane
79 posted on 01/14/2015 11:56:15 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

.
Insane!

.


80 posted on 01/14/2015 12:09:39 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson