Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5.6 Million Obamacare Enrollees Could Be in Big Trouble (In Thread:WashPost Graphics+BloombergPhoto)
Washington Post Graphics; Bloomberg Photo; The Motley Fool ^ | 10 Jan 15 | Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg; Sean Williams

Posted on 01/10/2015 7:32:32 PM PST by SkyPilot

More than half of the 2014-2015 enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act, best known as Obamacare, is in the books, and the enrollment figures on the surface look very encouraging.

To be clear, Obamacare is about more than just enrollment figures. For one thing, in order for the health reform law to be successful, it'll need people that enroll to actually continue paying their premium. This is the only way that medical care costs get spread out over a greater swath of the public, which is needed to control medical care cost inflation. However, between April and mid-October, for instance, around 1 million people stopped paying for their health insurance. The program will need to minimize this attrition in 2015 and beyond in order to be successful.

Surface enrollment data is strong In the meantime, Obamacare enrollments from week six (Dec. 20 to Dec. 26) continue to point toward the law bringing in more than the 9.1 million people that the Department of Health and Human Services had predicted.

Based on data for just the 37 states operating under the federally run Healthcare.gov, nearly 6.5 million people have selected plans. During week six just 96,446 people selected a plan, but this drop-off was expected considering both the holiday week and the fact that we're past the deadline whereby people could enroll and still be covered by Jan. 1, 2015. This deadline was a huge impetus to the enrollment surge witnessed in weeks four and five.

In spite of the subdued enrollment in week six, nearly 317,000 people window-shopped healthcare plans on Healthcare.gov and close to 1.4 million users were active on the site. The implication is that interest in obtaining health insurance is still high for many uninsured Americans.

Things are going well numbers-wise at the state level, too. Through mid-December some 1.1 million plan selections had been made, bringing the total number of selected plans through all 50 states to at least 7.6 million.

Here's a figure to worry about Yet fresh data from the HHS tells us that 5.6 million Obamacare enrollees and also investors have something to seriously worry about.

In a press release dated Dec. 30 the HHS announced that a whopping 87% of people enrolled through Healthcare.gov (5.6 million people) between Nov. 15, 2014, and Dec. 15, 2014, were getting financial assistance, also known as a subsidy. This is up from the 80% of enrollees who received a subsidy in the Nov. 15, 2013, to Dec. 15, 2013, period.

There are some positive takeaways from this figure. First, I'd suggest that fully functional software is making it easier for those who are eligible to receive a subsidy to enroll in the 2014-2015 period than in the prior enrollment period which was filled with glitches. Also, these subsidies act as a dangling carrot, encouraging people to enroll.

However, this seven percentage point rise in enrollees qualifying for subsidies could be a potential death knell for Obamacare based on a Supreme Court case expected to be ruled on sometime in June. Plaintiffs in the case argue that the language of the ACA is structured in such a way that only states running their own exchanges can divvy out subsidies to eligible individuals. Thus, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of the plaintiffs, it would mean that the 5.6 million people currently receiving subsidies via Healthcare.gov, the federally run exchange, would no longer receive those payments. I believe very, very few of those enrollees currently receiving a subsidy could afford healthcare without federal assistance.

The obvious solution is that states would need to build their own exchanges, however this is a task that would take one to two years to complete. I'm not certain that Obamacare could survive such a shock.

Very uncertain times To say the least, these are very uncertain times for health-benefits providers. Just as Obamacare has relied on subsidies to lower the rate of uninsured individuals, some insurers have geared their enrollment game plan around attracting these government-sponsored members. Redacting these subsidies now could be unpleasant for insurers' bottom-lines.

Let's discuss three different ways an investor could approach this critical decision in June. One way is, of course, to avoid the situation altogether. But, if you do, you could run the risk of missing out on big gains in the insurance sector in the meantime and following the Supreme Court's decision.

Your second option is to can focus on national insurers that have minimal exposure to Obamacare. In this instance, "minimal" exposure could simply mean insurers that have a balanced portfolio of products and which receive only a small amount of premium payments from Obamacare. UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH ) , the nation's largest insurer, for instance, receives a quarter of its revenue from Medicare Advantage plans and nets a good chunk as well from its health management service company Optum. This isn't to say an unfavorable ruling wouldn't affect UnitedHealth, but comparably speaking it would be in better shape than many of its smaller peers.

Lastly, you can choose to angle your investment strategy on insurers that operate in states that have their own exchange. While it's unlikely you're going to find any that operate solely in those states, some net a higher percentage of their Obamacare enrollees from states with their own exchanges than others. Molina Healthcare (NYSE: MOH ) , for example, generates a good number of enrollees from California, which operates its own exchange. Not to mention, Molina only recently dipped its toes into the water when it comes to operating in the individual insurance market. Losing a few thousand members wouldn't dramatically impact its bottom line.

One thing is for certain: it's going to be pins and needles for Obamacare, insurers, investors, and 5.6 million people receiving subsidies via Healthcare.gov until June.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aca; gibsmedat; healthcare; insurance; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: bert
My daughter had insurance, and needed a one day hospital stay after someone ran a red light and totaled her car, giving her minor injuries.

No wonder Americans are ready to revolt. If your insurance paperwork is not in complete order, the hospital costs can ruin you financially in just 24 hours.

But for the illegals, it is "free."

61 posted on 01/11/2015 7:04:40 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: funfan

In Texas you could always go to an emergency room for treatment and it would cost you nothing. I don’t know if that is still the case anymore, I certainly hope so.


62 posted on 01/11/2015 7:19:45 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Having worked doing returns at HR Block I can agree with you. Low income earners get back huge refunds and they depend on this money, they expect this money, they feel ENTITLED to this money (which is not a real tax refund but really just a welfare payment). When the tax preparer goes over the numbers at the end and point out that the IRS is about to take away a big chunk of that free money they’ve been getting, it will get ugly. Since the filer in question will not understand why the “free” healthcare they didn’t even sign up for is now costing them a lot of money they will get frustrated and angry and VOCAL. Even if they do signup the following year in order to not have their “refund” Grubered again they will soon discover that even with a subsidy they are still going to be paying much more out of pocket for healthcare they used to get for “free” at the local hospital’s Emergency Room. They will then drop out of Obamacare and then boom, they’ll get their ass robbed again come tax time! My heart goes out to all the tax preparers out there. It’s going to go from H&R Block to H&R Glock real fast.


63 posted on 01/11/2015 8:47:55 AM PST by Al Gore Vidal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
For one thing, in order for the health reform law to be successful, it'll need people that enroll to actually continue paying their premium

At last they've dropped the crap about Obamacare being about actual health care for people.

64 posted on 01/11/2015 8:50:28 AM PST by uncitizen (2015 Here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gore Vidal
Since the filer in question will not understand why the “free” healthcare they didn’t even sign up for is now costing them a lot of money they will get frustrated and angry and VOCAL. Even if they do signup the following year in order to not have their “refund” Grubered again they will soon discover that even with a subsidy they are still going to be paying much more out of pocket for healthcare they used to get for “free” at the local hospital’s Emergency Room. They will then drop out of Obamacare and then boom, they’ll get their ass robbed again come tax time!

Exactly. When Obama got on TV and promised everybody something for "free" - and that the OTHER guy would pick up the tab, not them - they were all for it.

65 posted on 01/11/2015 2:11:18 PM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I agree those are big factors, but bigger is the removal of Health Care from free (and / or fair) market forces. The cost of college education is a similar story, in that regard.


66 posted on 01/12/2015 5:04:30 AM PST by Paul R. (Leftists desire to control everything; In the end they invariably control nothing worth a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: funfan

The medical sharing plans are much cheaper (on a monthly basis at least) and are o-care approved.


67 posted on 01/12/2015 5:16:12 AM PST by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Really? I had not seen that. I so wish Orwell could have lived to comment on this insanity.


68 posted on 01/12/2015 5:20:20 AM PST by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

He is doing great as a “gavinator.”

Responses:

A) No need to read everything in the plan documents, Congress didn’t read the law before it was passed.

B) That’s where you sign right there, and auto debit is here.

C) If you have any questions call this number


69 posted on 01/13/2015 11:46:46 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson