My opinions are based on the historic record. If you disagree, point out from the record where I am wrong. The constitution as amended means what it says. Nothing in the record requires same subject applications. So what if dozens of amendments have piled up since the 19th century? The requisite number of applications for a convention was reached decades ago. Fact.
I was going to suggest you chat with a federal judge, off the record of course, to get a professional's view of the law concerning this issue. and why your understanding of the law is defective. Then I was going to ask you to chat with a congressman who is also a lawyer and bounce the judge's opinion against his. They would both explain it to you face-to-face in greater detail and at a speed much faster than my fingers can type. Unfortunately, I have a feeling you'd cross your arms in a defensive posture and refuse to listen to their legal advice.
You're very stubborn. But that stubbornness is not going to get a convention called. Only the current COS effort is going to get a convention called.
I'm done with this issue.