Posted on 01/08/2015 1:49:54 PM PST by detective
So tell us Bruce what would you call putting on display a Crucifix in a vat of urine?
|
How far is this from “Well, she shouldn’t have worn that miniskirt, she was asking for it”? |
Well now. That's a good question. Perhaps our M/A Freepers would like a shot at answering.
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
“What common good is served by creating more division and anger, and by tempting belligerent reaction?”
#1 - It makes appeasers like the author uncomfortable.
#2 - The reaction to the provocation reveals the idiocy of the positions that the appeasers advocate.
#3 - It tells our enemies that their attacks on us are futile and won’t accomplish their goals.
Stunningly stupid
Pretty sure he would find fault with a beautiful woman for dressing in any manner that shows off her assets and is then raped, beaten, murdered...
Po Moslems.
A large part of the problem would remain though if we don’t destroy these types of media institutions as we know them along with islam...
These people would regurgitate these same PC, infantile arguments all day long and spawn a whole new lineage of enablers if they’re not given the same as islam.
Therefore, by his own logic, he justifiably a target for violence.
Comment of the thread!
The only way you can identify our enemy is to lure him into a response. Problem for the French is the only thing they have to fight with are their hands... they’ve disarmed themselves and given away their country AND heritage. They are done, it’s over. Only another civil war (literally) will fix it... an that’s only if they act soon. Another 20 years and it’ll be far beyond the point of no return.
At first I thought this was onion, or something like it.
When I thought I had already read and heard the zenith of idiocy today, I ran into this little gem.
Oh, mercy, I didn’t want to see two women and two men kissing. Even though they are attractive and young, I bet that issue did not sell well on the stands.
Time Magazine, it’s what is on the back of the commode in most liberals’ bathroom.
I’m sure none of that was offensive to Muslim radicals.
A Freeper put on this site, videos ( I guess from street cams) of French people, many times women, getting punched in the face, just by walking by a Muslim.
They get set off just by our existence.
What this Crumley doesn't understand is that our very existence is tempting belligerent reaction. The Muslims want to kill us, all of us, simply for the fact that we are not Muslims. There is no way to appease them or live with them. They must be separated or destroyed.
If Time magazine had been around in 1775 we’d still be sending tribute to Queen Elizabeth.
What common good for us Infidels is; maybe seeing the reaction of the Muslims, the dumb naive Infidels might wake up and realize what a violent threat that religion is to non- Muslims. - Tom
TRue.
“videos ( I guess from street cams) of French people, many times women, getting punched in the face, just by walking by a Muslim.”
Do you have a link?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.