Throwing more gas on the fire
1 posted on
01/05/2015 6:01:52 PM PST by
digger48
To: digger48
2 posted on
01/05/2015 6:04:17 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(You can't half ass conservatism.)
To: digger48
Did someone force "the unnamed member" to be on the Grand Jury and to agree to the lifetime gag order?
Keep your word, weenies.
3 posted on
01/05/2015 6:05:10 PM PST by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
To: digger48
Maybe it would make for a nice bit of cash from a book deal....if I was a publisher, I would be trying to get someone on the grand jury to talk...just saying
4 posted on
01/05/2015 6:08:28 PM PST by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: digger48
Anyone want to bet on the background of this juror?
6 posted on
01/05/2015 6:15:30 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
To: digger48
They really want to start a race war.
7 posted on
01/05/2015 6:16:45 PM PST by
windcliff
To: digger48
“What (the grand juror) wants is to be able to be part of the conversation.”
Or really, just wants to write a book and profit.
10 posted on
01/05/2015 6:20:35 PM PST by
RetiredTexasVet
(Benghazi Clinton killed 4 & injured a dozen as SOS, imagine what she could do as CinC.)
To: digger48
with the insinuation that Brown, not Officer Darren Wilson, was the wrongdoer. No grand jurors have spoken publicly about the case.
Well DUH! Brown was the wrongdoer. When you attack a police officer that makes you the wrongdoer1
13 posted on
01/05/2015 6:25:05 PM PST by
SECURE AMERICA
(I am an American Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
To: digger48
The case didn’t belong in front of a grand jury. Disclosure of the evidence presented to it would serve to embarrass the DA.
14 posted on
01/05/2015 6:41:08 PM PST by
Misterioso
(Every major horror of history was committed in the name of an altruistic motive. - Ayn Rand)
To: digger48
YEP, EXACTLY!
We are seeing an example of justice based on popular opinion instead evidence, it's called a Lynch Mob.
16 posted on
01/05/2015 6:57:48 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: digger48
You mean I might be able to talk about things that happened while I was on grand jury duty other than standing five feet away from Vanessa Williams as she came out of her trailer, and seeing Arnold Schwarzenegger for a bit of a distance?
Good times.
(Have to find that picture I took of Ms. Williams ...)
17 posted on
01/05/2015 7:23:19 PM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: digger48
This nothing more than a juror wanting his/her fifteen minutes of fame and eventually a book deal, tv appearances and who knows what else.
18 posted on
01/05/2015 7:58:52 PM PST by
animal172
(Calling Thomas Jefferson)
To: digger48
Amazing! Why would a grand juror want to discuss this case? They knew at the time, it would be illegal.
21 posted on
01/06/2015 6:22:50 AM PST by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson