Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2015 7:03:48 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Useful stats, not sure if the drop to 129 million in 2012 from 131 million is that significant of a drop.


2 posted on 01/02/2015 7:13:04 AM PST by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If you have a job you are generally not too wasted to go vote at the end of a hard days work. With more people out of work and given up on finding work - well why bother?


3 posted on 01/02/2015 7:15:02 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Voter turnout boomed under Bush,not under Obama.

Voter turnout boomed under Bush, not under McCain or Romney. There, fixed it!

4 posted on 01/02/2015 7:16:13 AM PST by ZULU (Quo usque tandem abutere Obama patientia nostra?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

R Limbaugh and others keep saying that Romney lost 4 million (evangelical) votes.

I don’t see a statistic that supports that.

The nearest I could find was that McCain lost about 2.1 million over GW Bush.

2000: GW Bush 50.4 million [Gore 50.99 million]
2004: GW Bush 62.0 million
2008: J McCain 59.9 million
2012: M Romney 60.9 million


5 posted on 01/02/2015 7:26:12 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Can I be the first to say it?

Blame Bush!!!


8 posted on 01/02/2015 7:32:29 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You ain’t seen decline until Jeb gets the GOP nomination.


10 posted on 01/02/2015 7:50:06 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And .. an interesting stat from the 2004 election was over 4 MILLION MORE VOTERS turned out for Bush’s 2nd election.

That was the BASE .. who suddenly realized that if they didn’t vote, we were going to have John Kerry as President.

And .. again in 2010 and again in 2014, the base came to the rescue. Too bad the GOPe still think they’re smarter than we are.


11 posted on 01/02/2015 7:58:50 AM PST by CyberAnt ("The hope and changey stuff did not work, even a smidgen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Boomed in 2006 when we were taken to the cleaners big time. Not impressed.


17 posted on 01/02/2015 9:19:21 AM PST by napscoordinator (President Walker is our future President! Ted Cruz is the Senate Majority Leader in the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Voter turnout does not always mean it was due to “positives” about any incumbent, before or after an election. It can just as much be an increase in those desiring to definitely vote AGAINST someone. It is a level of voter excitement, that’s all, and excitement can be from positive, or from negative directions, depending on the individual.


21 posted on 01/02/2015 10:14:11 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson