Again, the following for any warmunist regardless of religious following:
Here is a simple way to get overloaded by the warmunists.
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet’
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
I love bringing those questions up to liberals. Their answer is always some emotional nonsense or a logical fallacy.
Excellent list of questions. Thank you.
8. Describe, in detail, the technologies available to mankind to control 1-6.
9. Describe, in detail, the interactions of all the atmospheric, terrestrial, geologic, and biological systems that contribute to 1-6. Include your plan for getting through the transient period from today to your ideal 1-6.
10. Describe, in detail, contingency plans, what could go wrong and how to mitigate them if we were so foolish as to try.
11. Justify how this attempt to “manage” nature on a global scale will be different than any of mankind’s other initial attempts to “manage” nature on much smaller scales - which haven’t worked out so well.
12. List the species of flora and fauna that will be stressed/lost by transitioning to the ideal 1-6.
13. Explain how holding climate in an artificial stasis would be a good thing when nature seems to abhor stagnation.
14. Characterize the annual costs in terms of money, energy, and resources to maintain this climatic utopia. Justify why this is a better use of these resources than say, finding a cure for cancer, or other diseases, space exploration, etc. (recognizing that our time on this rock is finite)
In other words Pope, stop spewing feel-good agenda-driven drivel and get real, show some leadership instead of following the crowd.
Is the earth getting closer to or further from these "correct" conditions?
Define which is better and why, El Nino or El Nina.
Define why CO2 is bad, when it supports vegetation and certain forms of sea life, two things the Left holds sacred
Explain why it is bad to have CO2, when the more there is, the more oxygen is produced by vegetation and certain forms of sea life?
Why are colder winters indicative of global warming?
Why are record colder winters not proof of cooling, but record warm days are proof of warming?
Why are losses of polar ice caps mourned out loud, but increases in polar ice caps are not celebrated out loud?
Why does the Left have to lie about polar bear numbers?
Why does the Left have to lie about Penguin numbers?
Otherwise known as Questions No Reporter Is Allowed to Ask.
Also:
What is the temperature of the Earth?
What was it fifteen years ago?
The Pope has obviously not even asked himself these questions, which means he’s not merely ignorant; he’s intellectually dishonest.
Vatican up for sale!
Many sacred relics at fire sale prices.
Everything must go!
Because, the way to affect the temperature of the planet is to give large amounts of money to the government.
It doesn’t matter as its all about change, or no change, to the evil left. They wait for an acorn to hit them in the head and take off running proclaiming doom to advance the agenda. Usually they shake the tree to begin with.
Exactly. I ask my sister all the time to point me to any weather event measured on this planet that has not been measured at some other point in time. She cannot do it.