To: E. Pluribus Unum
Fauxhontas could beat Hillary.
And she has yet to make a viable case for her candidacy.
2 posted on
12/27/2014 1:09:55 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
I agree she could, but she says flat out she won’t run.
5 posted on
12/27/2014 1:15:20 PM PST by
Hugin
("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
To: goldstategop
Warren turned out to be a better politician than Martha Coakley who Scott Brown beat the first time he ran, but I don't think she really appeals to a broad audience. When professors play at being populists a lot can go wrong with their messaging.
When Warren ran for senator, she had a lot of hard-luck stories about her childhood that weren't 100% true. And Meemaw telling her she was an Indian, etc. She's probably getting better at campaigning and could do Clinton some damage, but she's not ready for the big time yet.
15 posted on
12/27/2014 1:22:33 PM PST by
x
("It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.")
To: goldstategop
Liawatha is the ideal candidate. The moonbat left loves her, but she has no appeal to the rest of the country.
16 posted on
12/27/2014 1:22:58 PM PST by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: goldstategop
And she has yet to make a viable case for her candidacy. Irrelevant. Seriously.
She has a vagina (supposedly) and she campaigns as a populist, demonizing productive businesses for earning profits. She advocates a $20 hr minimum wage (for real). She is uber liberal and a documented lair and fraud.
What else does a Democrat voter need? Slam dunk.
43 posted on
12/27/2014 2:47:47 PM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: goldstategop
They both need to be crushed now. Take them completely out of politics forever.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson