I agree she could, but she says flat out she won’t run.
You mean Fauxhontas - sure she says she won’t run but if Hillary doesn’t look inevitable, look for that commitment to disappear.
She’s playing hard to get. She wants to have the nomination and election handed to her. She wants to play the act of “reluctant candidate” and “I’m doing this only because my country needs me.” And the left is desperate to have her run for two reasons:
1. They love her; she’s just what they really want in a president, and
2. They don’t love Hillary. No one does. She is more feared than loved, even by the left. And they know Hillary will be beaten. Too many negatives.
Make no mistake; Fauxahontas will be the democrat/communist candidate.
I heard her interviewed.
"Are you planning to run in 2016?"
"I have no plans to run."
"But in 2016. Will you be running in 2016?"
"I said I have no plans to run."
"Right now. But are you planning on running in 2016."
"I am not planning on running right now."
That's almost verbatim. And that represents her people skills.
when pressed on whether that was present tense only she pointedly refused to expand on the statement.
No, she says she isn’t running (as in right now, the door is left open for later).
“I agree she could, but she says flat out she won’t run.”
She has never, even when pressed, said she “won’t run”.
She always says, “I’m not running”, which is a completely different statement in politician-speak.
Warren is delaying announcement so as to contrive a "draft Warren" narrative, faking popular support for her simulated reluctant agreement to run and save womanhood.
(Hillary has not yet learned that there is absolutely NO HONOR AMONG THIEVES!)
.