Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Is Mentally Unhinged
Townhall.com ^ | December 27, 2014 | Mark Nuckols

Posted on 12/27/2014 6:12:17 AM PST by Kaslin

In his annual year end press conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin showed beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is in fact mentally unhinged. For three hours, by turns he demonstrated signs of schizophrenic paranoia, pathological dishonesty, deep seated passive-aggressive tendencies, woeful ignorance of world affairs and economics, and delusional confidence in Russia’s future prospects.

Putin evokes the national self-image of the Russian bear. Putin’s bear is a natural hunter contentedly chasing pigs and boars, but otherwise minding his own business in his own sovereign forest. But somebody wants this bear to have a makeover, and to give up manly boar hunting for meekly picking berries and eating honey. But even that won’t be enough for this bear’s implacable adversaries. No, they want to chain up this proud bear, and remove his teeth and claws. And once he’s been defanged, he’ll be stuffed and put on display by the mantle.

Putin makes clear that as long as he’s in charge, the bear’s going to keep his teeth and claws - otherwise known as nuclear weapons. And if the bear didn’t have nukes, his enemies would take over his forest, with all of its oil and gas. Putin is the only world leader other than Kim Jong-un to so blithely menace the world with nuclear Armageddon.

And if that doesn’t unnerve you, Putin’s display of full blown paranoia should. He sees shadowy conspiracies against Russia everywhere. After fighting an appallingly dirty war against separatists in Chechnya, Russia has been plagued by low grade conflict and terrorism in its North Caucasus. According to Putin, these entirely home-grown domestic terrorists are supported by the West, “an established fact” that “everyone knows.”

And what about the Sochi Olympics? This was supposed to be Putin glorious moment in the sun (and incidentally a massive $50 billion boondoggle for his friends). Criticism of the Olympian graft and Russia’s repression of gays were all part of a “clearly orchestrated” campaign to discredit Russia. “This is an undeniable fact!” (Having myself written several op-eds criticizing Sochi, if there was such a campaign I’m still waiting for my paycheck.)

These same devious foreigners (read: “Americans”) want to steal Siberia. Putin repeats a long debunked urban myth that a high level American official once claimed it was “unfair” that “the whole of Siberia with its immense resources” should belong to Russia. Russian security agencies ascribe this avaricious sentiment to former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, based on a mind reading apparatus that can tell a person’s inner thoughts based on their facial expressions.

And Putin is bitter and angry that a country as peaceable as his is surrounded by warmongers. He repeatedly claims that NATO’s eastward expansion “right up to our borders” is some sort of dirty trick that fundamentally infringes Russian rights. He seems unaware that after the end of the Soviet Empire, every single former Warsaw Pact member (and three former Soviet republics) made membership in NATO a national priority to protect themselves from the above mentioned bear.

He’s also indignantly self-pitying. He whinges that Russia only has two foreign military bases, in strategic Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, while “U.S. bases are scattered around the globe.” And then Pentagon’s budget is ten times that of Russia’s military budget. It’s unfair, and obviously proof that it’s American and not Russian aggression the world has to worry about. Never mind that American troops are stationed around the world with the sovereign consent on our allies, and are there to protect them from rogue leaders like Putin.

Putin lies with such ease that it is hard to be sure he doesn’t actually believe his own lies. He breezily denies that Russia is fomenting a war in eastern Ukraine. Russia hasn’t been shipping arms and anti-aircraft rockets, it’s only sent “humanitarian convoys.” And annexing Crimea, territory of a neighboring state, wasn’t an infringement of Ukrainian sovereignty, it was a defense of Russia’s right to exist.

Even as the ruble collapses and Russia heads into the teeth of a severe recession, Putin paints a rosy economic picture. The decline in the ruble is “primarily” due to “external factors,” such as sanctions, falling energy prices, and “profiteering” by shady currency speculators. But Russia will easily “adjust” to sharply lower energy prices, despite the fact that oil and gas make up half the government budget and a quarter of GDP.

Putin expresses confidence that lower energy prices are actually a benefit, because it will be a reason to diversifying Russia’s economy away from dependence on energy exports. Putin has made this a promise regularly for the last 14 years. But Putin has a glib explanation why there’s been zero forward progress under his reign, it’s because businesses only want “fast and easy profits” from natural resources instead of investing in "unprofitable" sectors like technology and manufacturing. Putin seems utterly ignorant of the fact that it's only in his inefficient and kleptocratic state that technology and manufacturing are unprofitable.

Putin is anyway confident that energy prices will “inevitably” rebound, because the “global economy will grow.” The global economy is growing, but energy prices are falling anyway because more sophisticated Western technology is bringing more and more supply into the market.Again, Putin seems unaware of basic trends even in energy markets.

In one of the dumbest moves imaginable, earlier this year Putin decided to respond to Western economic sanctions by banning food imports from Europe. The ban marginally hurts EU food producers, but fueled a substantial increase in food inflation as those imports now have to come from far flung producers such as Brazil. And now with the ruble worth half what is was six months ago, inflation will really rip loose. That doesn’t worry Putin, as the government plans to “talk to producers” and convince them not to raise prices dramatically.

Interestingly, one word nobody mentioned in the talkathon was “corruption.” Russia has been for decades tied with the likes of Nigeria in global corruption rankings, and everyone and his dog knows corruption is Russia’s number one problem. But Putin merely expresses his confidence that the government and the central bank have been “taking all appropriate measures” and have the rapidly crumbling economic situation under control.

Putin proudly points to Sochi and the 2018 World Cup as proof of his successful governing strategy. It’s widely estimated that half of the $50 billion sunk into the Sochi Olympics was stolen outright, and the other half is a white elephant that will never recover its costs. But as Putin gloats, Sochi hosted a Formula 1 race for the first time in Russian history (and the one Russian team finished last, by the way). And by expenditure of $20 billion to host the World Cup will have the happy result of encouraging the populace to join sports clubs.

And Putin is casually dismissive of the few domestic critics that dare express any dissent against his regime. As he puts it, “there is afine line between domestic opposition and (traitorous) fifth columnists.” And in any event, his critics are mere “bander-logs,” the chattering monkeys of Rudyard Kipling’s jungle tales.

Thanks to the gross incompetence and greed of Putin and his Kremlin cronies, Russia is heading into economic disaster. And his internal repression, nationalistic posturing, and policy of foreign aggression are turning Russia into a pariah state. But to listen to Vladimir Putin’s version of affairs, none of this is his personal responsibility. And maybe more scarily, most of the Russian public accept his paranoia, lies and delusions with nary a sign of criticism. The rest of the world should be more skeptical of this vicous tin-pot autocrat, and deeply worried about what Putin is capable of doing next as the Russian economy begins to fall apart at the seams over the next few years.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: eu; glbalists; imf; nwo; propaganda; putin; putinmental; putinsbuttboys; putinsotu; russia; sanctions; soros; syria; vladtheimploder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Kaslin
China foreign minister says willing to help Russia
61 posted on 12/27/2014 10:49:27 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

...while our own country is governed by a bunch of monsters COMMUNISTS.


Right, there are other monsters besides communist.


62 posted on 12/27/2014 10:52:39 AM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The lefties showed up and made sure that this thread was about nothing.

Russian leaders had their American groupies in the 1980s, 1970, and 1960s, and all the way back , so it is nothing new to have some of them here, even on FR.

Just let it be a reminder that the grovelers and peace niks never change.


63 posted on 12/27/2014 10:53:59 AM PST by ansel12 (They hate us, because they ain't us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Like what?


64 posted on 12/27/2014 10:55:35 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Bearing in mind that (and sticking with the Obama-relativism of which people are so fond), Obama used to be opposed to gay marriage. What did you think of him, then?


65 posted on 12/27/2014 11:00:43 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Huh?

Russia should be governed by “saints” regardless of what’s going on here and of course the opposite holds true.


The founding of this nation was credited on the divinity of the creator, but I have no idea what Russia was founded on.

What does BTW mean?


66 posted on 12/27/2014 11:07:16 AM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bork Obunga is merely “Putin-lite” (as in “Bud-lite”).

They are of the same left-wing cloth. Marxists. Obama is a wannabe communist, but Putin is the real thing. Both Obama and Putin are pathological narcissists too.

And, by the way, in terms of socioeconomic policy, Bork Obunga and Hitler were of the same left-wing cloth:

“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”

—Adolph Hitler, 1938
—Barack Obama, 2014

(Hitler was a Democrat).


67 posted on 12/27/2014 11:23:29 AM PST by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Putin is crazy?

Perhaps.

But he figured out the most important part of staying in power.

When you have nuclear weapons, the rest of the world won’t mess with you.

By the way, some of the numbers quoted by the author are absurd.

$50 billion spent on the Olympics? $20 billion spent on the World Cup?

Even if that’s true, how could anyone outside the Russian Treasury make a verifiable estimate?


68 posted on 12/27/2014 11:44:59 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Bearing in mind that (and sticking with the Obama-relativism of which people are so fond), Obama used to be opposed to gay marriage. What did you think of him, then?


I did not like him then either, I voted for the other pawns both times.

Cain was one of my choices and possible the best one in 2012.

That should explain why I did not vote for Obama.


69 posted on 12/27/2014 11:47:48 AM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Like what?


Monsters can come from any direction and under any name.

Hitler was considered on the right because he hated communism, but communism does not make me love dictators and dictators does not make me love communists.


70 posted on 12/27/2014 12:04:46 PM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
In other words, you looked at the totality of Obama's qualifications. Why not with Putin?
71 posted on 12/27/2014 12:09:03 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's the same old 1960s idea of tagging everything one disapproves of as insane.

It provides an easy way of condemning one's enemies but doesn't really have much to do with psychopathology.

Look at the system that produced Putin and that he functions in, or the game he's playing, or the presuppositions and principles he works under, rather than simply throwing around the word insane.

That doesn't make him any better a person than the writer thinks he is, but it does describe Putin in a more substantial way.

72 posted on 12/27/2014 12:19:41 PM PST by x ("It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Why not with Putin?


Because Putin was not running for president or anything else in this country.


73 posted on 12/27/2014 12:36:06 PM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

All you appear to be doing is disqualifying yourself from commenting about Putin at all.


74 posted on 12/27/2014 12:41:42 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

All you appear to be doing is disqualifying yourself from commenting about Putin at all.


Yep, you got that right, it is what is happening here which concerns me first.

After we get straightened out which is very doubtful maybe I can start bashing the hell out of Putin.


75 posted on 12/27/2014 1:23:41 PM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time.


76 posted on 12/27/2014 1:28:30 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Authoritarians, totalitarians, monarchs....all come from the left. There are leftists to the right of Pol Pot and Kim Jung Il, but they’re still leftist.

Nazi was short for “National Socialist Workers Party” The National Socialists.

I see no indication that Hitler had a deep appreciation for the “right wing’s” individual rights/limited government philosophy, but he certainly did engage in “social engineering” didn’t he.

And ska-rew that fraudulent “circle graph” that’s just a sales gimmick to promote socialism.


77 posted on 12/27/2014 1:30:51 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

I see no indication that Hitler had a deep appreciation for the “right wing’s” individual rights/limited government philosophy, but he certainly did engage in “social engineering” didn’t he.


Putin is against homosexual marriage, is that being right wing or left wing?

Hitler was against men becoming feminine, is that right wing or left wing?

The conservatives today will call Hitler liberal and the liberals will say he was conservatives.

There is no such thing as right or wrong it just depends on what party says it.

I vote conservative, not because I agree with everything but it is just to keep the stinking liberals out.

I see no indication that Hitler had a deep appreciation for the “right wing’s” individual rights/limited government philosophy,>>>>>>>>

That is right, he was only for power any way he could get it.


78 posted on 12/27/2014 4:01:26 PM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time.


I have heard the same thing, but be careful if you try it as a fall could hurt you.


79 posted on 12/27/2014 4:06:54 PM PST by ravenwolf (t know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Imagine if those people happened along an Obama thread. Yes, I know that they are rare here.

Rather odd, isn't it?

Jesus Christ: You can’t impeach Him and He ain’t gonna resign.




80 posted on 12/27/2014 4:23:44 PM PST by rdb3 (Meh! A hole-in-one is just an eagle. Sink an albatross!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson