Merry Christmas, FRiends!!!
Rubio because he's Cuban. Plus the other same old faces...Rogers, McCain, Graham... The drivebys scrap the bottom of the bartrel once again... Candy gets a reach-around from Barrack on her way out the (very wide) door...
What they say is almost always contrary to what they do. Watching them through the filter of disgust I have for most of them means they are saying what they think we want to hear. Not what's in their hearts. For the vast majority of these guests what they want is power and control over the American electorate and they will manipulate laws, regulations and whatever else the public will allow them to manipulate to reach that ultimate goal: Total subservience to the government.
McCain is worthless POS and should be shunned. His personality could have been what inspired the character Two Face in the Batman world.
Is Rubio going to really attack the president on Cuba? Seriously? To what end?
Graham? He's going to attack Obama on amnesty, right? How can he when he's all for it.
Good grief! Why bother?
The only two people worth anything is Johnson and Rubio. Rubio when be was on WFLA said that when he spoke about amnesty the media didn’t show all of what be said. Johnson is supposed to be a Tea Party member.
Wallace (FOX “News”) indicates he regards the cyber attack
(allegedly N. Korea) as an “act of war”.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich agrees.
Rogers wants a cyber attack back on them
to “make it difficult for them”
because they stopped “people who
wanted to see the movie”.
He wants NSA to work with the “private sector”
and “share malicious source code so that they
can protect themselves”.
Wallace brings up the (Islamic - not mentioned)
terrorist in Australia.
Wallace: “How big a threat are lone wolves”?
Rodgers points out that ISIS (he calls it “ISIL”
like the Tyrant) told the Australian murderers
to remain there and make havoc.
Wallace brings up Benghazi. Wallace puts up
short interviews of two witnesses who were THERE,
and who were ignored in/for the Congressional “report”.
Why were they ignored? says Wallace.
Rogers says there were TV reports indicated that they
were questioned. (Yes, he relied on television reports).
Then, Rogers ignores the question and diverts to other
witnesses they did interview.
Odiously, Rogers actually demeans the witnesses
saying their “version” was wrong and “not corroborated”
by the State Dept and White House “talking points”.
Rogers then defends the “talking points” and ignores
the role of the matter’s timing in the Election.
“It was beyond the scope (of the report)”, says Rogers.
IRS? - nothing.
Fast&Furious? - nothing.
open borders? - nothing.
amnesty? - nothing.
EV-D68 importation? - nothing.
Wasteful budget? - nothing.
Treason in DC? - nothing.
Destruction of Economy? - nothing.
Obama Administration Lying to Congress? - nothing.
Obama Administration Lying to America? - nothing.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I assume that all of these shows are taped on Friday or Saturday.
If so, there will be little if any discussion of the NYPD police shooting on today’s shows.
Is that right?
Are there any exceptions?
Rogers' wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers, was, until recently, the president and CEO of Aegis LLC a "security" defense contractor company, whom she helped to secure a $10 billion (with a b) contract with the State Department.
Over the course of his career, he has collected over his $320,000 from interest groups supporting CISPA
In 2013 he made the remark: You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated.
The man belongs in jail, not in Congress
Wallace called the president,”President Clinton”.
I am enjoying hearing the Progressive “solution” to the Sony Blackmail.
After all, Alinsky invented the move, and 0bamba deployed the strategy his entire career.
Only difference is that someone, prolly not the Norks, hacked into Sony to gather all the personal dirt.
I’ve become a fan of Meet the Press...