Replies

Wallace (FOX “News”) indicates he regards the cyber attack
(allegedly N. Korea) as an “act of war”.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich agrees.
Rogers wants a cyber attack back on them
to “make it difficult for them”
because they stopped “people who
wanted to see the movie”.
He wants NSA to work with the “private sector”
and “share malicious source code so that they
can protect themselves”.

Wallace brings up the (Islamic - not mentioned)
terrorist in Australia.
Wallace: “How big a threat are lone wolves”?
Rodgers points out that ISIS (he calls it “ISIL”
like the Tyrant) told the Australian murderers
to remain there and make havoc.

Wallace brings up Benghazi. Wallace puts up
short interviews of two witnesses who were THERE,
and who were ignored in/for the Congressional “report”.
Why were they ignored? says Wallace.
Rogers says there were TV reports indicated that they
were questioned. (Yes, he relied on television reports).
Then, Rogers ignores the question and diverts to other
witnesses they did interview.
Odiously, Rogers actually demeans the witnesses
saying their “version” was wrong and “not corroborated”
by the State Dept and White House “talking points”.
Rogers then defends the “talking points” and ignores
the role of the matter’s timing in the Election.
“It was beyond the scope (of the report)”, says Rogers.

IRS? - nothing.
Fast&Furious? - nothing.
open borders? - nothing.
amnesty? - nothing.
EV-D68 importation? - nothing.
Wasteful budget? - nothing.
Treason in DC? - nothing.
Destruction of Economy? - nothing.
Obama Administration Lying to Congress? - nothing.
Obama Administration Lying to America? - nothing.

Rogers is leaving because he and his wife will be implicated, that’s why he distorted the Benghazi Report, is doing this Media farewell cover up tour and getting the hell off of the National Stage!

If you hear his b/s radio show on one of your syndicates…turn it off. Call the station and tell ‘em the show sucks and then just leave it be.