Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Big Is the Ted Cruz Caucus?
Roll Call's #WGDB Blog ^ | December 14, 2014 | Steven Dennis

Posted on 12/14/2014 10:49:21 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

It’s a question that will prove crucial next year when Mitch McConnell takes the reins of a new Senate: Just how big is the Ted Cruz caucus?

Three votes on the “cromnibus” late Saturday night suggest it could be as large as 22 senators — a dangerously high number for McConnell — or as few as a handful.

Let’s break down the three votes — on filibustering the $1.1 trillion package, on Cruz’s point of order aimed at targeting the president’s immigration action, and final passage.

The high-water mark for the Texas Republican came on his point of order vote, which 22 Republicans backed. While that represented a thumping, it could also be seen as a show of strength against the McConnell forces. Just 20 Republicans, including McConnell Republican Whip John Cornyn of Texas voted against Cruz; three did not vote.

Cruz’s point of order itself basically contended that the underlying bill was unconstitutional because it didn’t block President Barack Obama’s immigration action. Many Republicans, including Cruz, say they oppose the immigration action but don’t think the cromnibus itself is unconstitutional.

On final passage of the cromnibus, 18 Republicans voted no.

But only 12 Republicans joined Cruz in both votes for both his point of order and against the cromnibus. They are: Sens. Michael D. Crapo of Idaho, Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, Mike Lee of Utah, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Rob Portman of Ohio, Jim Risch of Idaho, Marco Rubio of Florida, Tim Scott of South Carolina, Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama and David Vitter of Louisiana.

Nine others switched to yes on final passage after voting with Cruz to say the bill itself was unconstitutional. They are: Sens. Roy Blunt of Missouri, John Boozman of Arkansas, Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, Deb Fischer of Nebraska, John Hoeven of North Dakota, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Mike Johanns of Nebraska, Pat Roberts of Kansas and John Thune of South Dakota. Johanns is retiring.

Those nine Republicans ended up providing the margin of victory for the underlying cromnibus, which passed 56-40.

Even that group of a dozen might be overstating Cruz’s hold on the GOP.

An even smaller subset of the Senate Republicans — 11 of them — voted with Cruz against final passage, for his point of order and to filibuster the bill in the first place: Crapo, Lee, Moran, Paul, Portman, Risch, Rubio, Scott, Shelby, Sessions and Vitter.

That’s more than enough to cause McConnell trouble given that he will have 54 Republicans in his camp and will need to get to 60 votes on most bills and likely 51 Republicans to pass a budget resolution.

Notable in the group who consistently voted with Cruz are his potential presidential rivals Paul and Rubio.

It’s also worth noting that Rubio continues his shift to the right after helping write the Senate immigration bill last year.

No Democrats supported the Cruz point of order.

Correction, 11:28 a.m.

An earlier version of this post omitted Scott as voting against cloture.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; aliens; amnesty; cannabis; cromnibus; cruz; cruzcaucus; elections; marijuana; mcconnell; omnibus; pot; senate; tedcruz; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: Pontiac

There was a time when Portman was an extremely conservative representative in the House from Ohio’s very conservative 2d district.


61 posted on 12/14/2014 6:02:17 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
62 posted on 12/14/2014 6:18:46 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

GOPc


I like that!


63 posted on 12/14/2014 6:22:22 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

How big?

My man could win this thing! Hands down!


64 posted on 12/14/2014 6:26:16 PM PST by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris, Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: aimee5291

Peter Wehner sounds like a huge RINO....just like Powerline’s Paul Mirengoff.

FWIW, Mirengoff is pretty much getting slammed, on his own site (at the comments following), for the Cruz attack piece.


65 posted on 12/14/2014 6:28:30 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Will be interesting to see where the 9, is it 9, new R Senators lie . . . with the GOPe or with real conservatives like Cruz, Lee & Sessions.


66 posted on 12/14/2014 6:56:16 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Yep, Alabama has two very good senators.


67 posted on 12/14/2014 7:03:24 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Ted Cruz 38.01% (4,387 votes)

Rand Paul 35.25% (4,068 votes)

Dr. Ben Carson 13.65% (1,575 votes)

Scott Walker 3.4% (392 votes)

Rick Perry 3.26% (376 votes)

Mike Huckabee 2.77% (320 votes)

Jeb Bush 2.56% (296 votes)

Chris Christie 0.73% (84 votes)

Marco Rubio 0% (44 votes)

Total Votes: 11,542

http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/11/ben_carson_jeb_bush_rand_paul.html


68 posted on 12/14/2014 7:09:48 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

That looks about right. Texas gets the spotlight for its solid conservatism but Alabama is a true stronghold too. The people here really get it.


69 posted on 12/14/2014 7:29:14 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Go Alabama. Crimson Tide!


70 posted on 12/14/2014 7:31:36 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

The Paulite hipsters failed to pull him over the line on this one. Social un-conservatives. Conservative is a lifestyle not an anarchist movement that is amoral.


71 posted on 12/14/2014 7:36:10 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cruz works tirelessly to thwart RINOs and Democrats. God bless him!


72 posted on 12/14/2014 7:39:40 PM PST by stilloftyhenight (...shut it down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

Sure, although the notion that Rand Paul is an amoral anarchist may be a little over the top.


73 posted on 12/14/2014 7:45:34 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Sure, although the notion that Rand Paul is an amoral anarchist may be a little over the top.

Paul agrees with the Founders until they speak of a moral society being the only way Freedom works. His departure from this causes reservations.

74 posted on 12/14/2014 7:49:00 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

So Rand Paul favors an immoral society?


75 posted on 12/14/2014 7:52:56 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
So Rand Paul favors an immoral society?

Rand Paul Quote, waffling at best:

Speaking on Roe v. Wade:

“My intention is to bring it forward and to have a healthy philosophic and moral discussion over what we should do, what the state should be involved with, when should life be protected. And I don’t think we’re ready yet, our society, maybe, to change any laws, but I think its worthwhile having the discussion if we can keep it from being too much of a flippant of a discussion over this that concrete this and that,”

http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/21/after-controversy-rand-paul-clarifies-hes-100-pro-life-on-abortion/

Sen. Rand Paul “would agree” with legalizing marijuana and other drugs, and investing the resulting savings into funding Social Security. At least that’s what he said during a television appearance in June of 2000, years before he was elected to the U.S. Senate.

http://marijuana.com/news/2014/10/rand-paul-on-legalizing-drugs-i-would-agree/

76 posted on 12/14/2014 8:04:38 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

Is he wrong that society doesn’t seem ready to change the law yet? If society were ready, there would be legislative majorities. I don’t see where he’s too far off the mark here.

As for marijuana, I don’t think that’s much of a litmus test. William F. Buckley favored legalization. Was he an amoral anarchist?


77 posted on 12/14/2014 8:18:41 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
So does Idaho :-)
78 posted on 12/14/2014 8:29:24 PM PST by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Is he wrong that society doesn’t seem ready to change the law yet? If society were ready, there would be legislative majorities. I don’t see where he’s too far off the mark here.

As for marijuana, I don’t think that’s much of a litmus test. William F. Buckley favored legalization. Was he an amoral anarchist?

The Founders would see him as amoral in his responses, as well as most believers. Unfortunately most of his followers are.

I have two teenage children and don't want his influence on their decisions in life. Very negative toward personal responsibility.

79 posted on 12/14/2014 8:32:34 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our reality and has seen fit to offer us a pardon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

So your children are going to smoke pot if the government doesn’t keep it illegal? To me it’s the job of parents to instill moral values and character in their children.

William F. Buckley and Ronald Reagan were friends. Buckley was a committed Catholic and a social conservative.


80 posted on 12/14/2014 8:58:09 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson