[canuck_conservative]

without any evidence whatsoever

Not true. Look at The Coz's damning non-response when recently asked about the charges.

An truly innocent person would never stop shouting their innocence.

Cosby, by contrast, looked like someone who had just been told by a lawyer "anything you say could be used against you in court, so don't say anything".

Cosby looked .... guilty - by his own non-testimony.

[Talisker]

Not true. Look at The Coz's damning non-response when recently asked about the charges. An truly innocent person would never stop shouting their innocence. Cosby, by contrast, looked like someone who had just been told by a lawyer "anything you say could be used against you in court, so don't say anything". Cosby looked .... guilty - by his own non-testimony.

On November 16, Cosby broke his silence regarding a series of sexual assault allegations via a brief statement posted by his attorney on his Web site. It read: “Over the last several weeks, decade-old, discredited allegations against Mr. Cosby have resurfaced. The fact that they are being repeated does not make them true. Mr. Cosby does not intend to dignify these allegations with any comment."

THINK about it. He is being accused without any evidence. What can he possibly say? That he didn't do it? That these allegations arose in the past and were not proven then, and that no charges were pressed then? And that he's not going to go into all of it all over again, given that absolutely no new evidence has arisen?

Well that's what he said.

Yeah, through an attorney. That makes him guilty? LOL! The entire world is slandering him all of a sudden, and Allred is demanding a hundred million dollars without any evidence or trial, and he's being accused of drugging and raping underaged girls - and having an attorney proves his guilt? What nonsense.

And what WOULD you have him say, other than what he DID say, and which was turned into a refusal to speak by everyone - including you - when it was no such thing? He said the charges were long discredited and merely repeated, and that doesn't make them true. That's legal-speak to protect him from angling sharks, something you hire an attorney to do for you. And see how his fears were right - he gave an answer, and it's being called a refusal to answer.

In any event, none of that is evidence against him. None of it. It's just slander by highly dubious accusers who admit to voluntarily spending private time with him who now admit they want money, whipped up by the media wolfpack - that's it. Yeah, they sound really honest.

And it's not like Cosby ever pissed off the Black Democrat Plantation Overseers by, oh I don't know, telling Blacks to get off of government money and make something of themselves and stop blaming whitey. I mean, if he did that, maybe there'd be a REASON to slander him before an election campaign started, since he was about to get a new TV show. But that didn't happen... right?