[Gaffer]

He was ‘alive’ before the police grabbed him; he was ‘dead’ afterwards. How hard is this to understand?

[chris37]

It’s hard, I don’t understand it.

Please be more specific.

What specific police action killed him?

Please provide a specific answer and proof beyond a reasonable doubt or even proof beyond a preponderance of the evidence to such.

[driftless2]

Did he break the law or not? Yes, he was breaking the law. Did he resist arrest? Yes he did. If he had not broken the law in the first place and not resisted arrest, he’d still be alive. How hard is that to understand?

[Uri’el-2012]

He was ‘alive’ before the police grabbed him; he was ‘dead’ afterwards. How hard is this to understand?

Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc

Logical fallacy !