Again, we’re in agreement. My comments that this particular aspect of the topic is wasteful and will be negatively portrayed does not in any manner impinge upon his right to discuss it. That’s why it was posted as an opinion. Differing opinions used to be met with debate of their respective merits, instead of accusations of censure. Alas FR.
Ah well perhaps I was too hasty. My apologies to you.
That particular line of conversation didn’t materialize anyway, it doesn’t seem to have an real bearing on the central issues of this matter.