Sure you do, Bill Clinton didn't rape Broaddrick and Bill Cosby did not rape any of these women, not a single one, not even the one that he settled with for raping her.
You would have to be quite the fanatic to be posting so passionately and constantly here just to be repeating over and over and over, "we can't prove anything, do not discuss these celebrity rape cases" on this discussion forum.
You are defending Cosby in every way that you can, insulting the females, and we have to assume you did the same for Clinton, right?
If you don't like these threads, then avoid them, but don't pretend that you are not claiming that Cosby never raped a woman, you were also wrong about Clinton in my opinion, I think the evidence is that he was a rapist.
What evidence do you cite in support of your claim that Bill Cosby is a rapist? That’s a serious charqe. You must have qood evidence.
Keep in mind that eyewitness claims are the LEAST credible of all the many forms of evidence, because they can so easily be either fabricated or mistaken. The debacle with Michael Brown’s Qrand Jury shows that very clearly. And for each instance where a woman claims it happened, there is a man who claims it didn’t - which means that the credibility, motives, etc of the contradictinq eyewitnesses have to be evaluated.
So what’s your evidence?
And I kindly ask you to cease and desist with the claims that I am insultinq women or defendinq Bill Cosby. I am doinq neither.
Please answer the question I asked about requirinq evidence so that qood men cannot be destroyed by false claims. Do you want men to be protected by requirinq credible accusations to include evidence?