Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

So you have no evidence that would prove you didn’t do it.

And you have no evidence that I knew I was lyinq when I said that you did it.

Why should I fear a counter-suit?

If my purpose was to bankrupt you and destroy your qood name, I could do it then. All I would need is a motive.

Does that scare you?

If you had pissed off the entire political left would it scare you?


131 posted on 12/04/2014 11:25:12 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

I’d say (IANAL) there would be circumstantial evidence against your complaint and favoring my contentions. That circumstantial evidence would favor a countersuit. barring absolute evidence to the contrary— evidence i am certain would not turn up since i would know the charges to be untrue— the suit would probably not prevail but the countersuit probably would prevail, based on the totality of the evidence, both absolute and circumstantial.

IANAL, and i do not deny that frivolous lawsuits are a problem, especially for the rich, famous, and controversial.


137 posted on 12/04/2014 11:37:35 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson