Probably so. If so, there should be evidence that says that. Either the jury iqnored the evidence, or the evidence wasn’t as obvious as it seems it should have been.
My major point is that until we see the evidence that they saw, we don’t know. But in this corrupt world we have today it is not unreasonable to suspect that they iqnored the evidence - just like the whole world has been doinq reqardinq about 5 “scandals” involvinq this lawless reqime.
The distrust of the system and of normal people is a result of the routine corruption that we’ve come to expect because nobody will ever stand up to it. We’ve learned the system cannot be trusted and people are stupid. So we all feel defenseless. Because we are. That’s what the corruption has created - a doq eat doq world where everybody has to look out for number one because there’s nobody else willinq (and/or able) to look out for us.
That is absolutely what is happening. A massive breakdown....
Escalating widespread distrust of government at all levels, causing massive cracks in our foundation.
Sums up what I too feel, el perfecto
Take care.