Posted on 12/02/2014 1:04:28 PM PST by Zakeet
Hillary Clinton argued for forceful action to fight climate change in an environmental speech on Monday night, but did not mention the controversial Keystone pipeline.
[Snip]
The science of climate change is unforgiving, no matter what the deniers may say, sea levels are rising, ice caps are melting, storms, droughts and wildfires are wreaking havoc, Clinton said, according to ABC News.
The political challenges are also unforgiving, there is no getting around the fact the kind of ambitious response required to effectively combat climate change is going to be a tough sell at home and around the world at a time when so many countries including our own are grappling with slow growth and stretched budgets.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“...changing”? Is she referring to her Depends?
[[...changing? Is she referring to her Depends?]]
That depends
The Artic is now at a ten year high...
Run for president, Hillary; this country needs another brain-dead, Leftist ideologue.
She’s becoming an aged fossil. I believe that God is inscribing her hate on her face. Picture of Dorian Gray, anyone?
It’s the sun. It’s going asleep for a few years. It’s going to be cold for a while.
;-)
Her picture is in the dictionary next to stupid.
I think the check from Tom Steyr just cleared and so she did her part to earn it.
Pay to play.
Oh boy, if she gets in office, she’ll be milking the environmental Reichstag fire for all it’s worth.
Republicans Promise Keystone XL Bill, But Will It Get Signed?
Global Warming on Free Republic
Can you add me to your GW ping list? TY
We can’t breathe! We can’t breathe! We can’t breathe! Wait......dude, that’s the wrong.....What difference does it make now?
There are enough CO2 molecules in 0.04% to absorb every infrared photon emitted from the earth's surface in the first 10 meters of atmosphere. Those CO2 molecules almost instantaneously transfer that energy to the N2 and O2 molecules making them warmer than they would be otherwise.
--> Every infrared photon with the right wavelength for CO2. That's an important caveat because it means saturation causes logarithmic diminishing warming and it also means water vapor is more important.
I’d like to know just what satellite he is claiming has shown a rise in ocean levels as I know of no satellite that can accurately measure 5 centimeters of ocean surface levels.
“There are enough CO2 molecules in 0.04% to absorb every infrared photon emitted from the earth’s surface in the first 10 meters of atmosphere.”
Which is why we have thermal imaging satellites picking up IR from the Earth’s surface in space, because CO2 absorbs all IR photons “in the first 10 meters of the Earth’s Surface”?
Where did you read this line of BS?
The warmists have tried to erase those from the historical record. They say those were regional warming only. The rest of the Earth was cooler. Seriously.
TOPEX, Jason-1 and Jason-2.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.