"What's good for the goose........?"
This is why Dems want to regulate the internet. They’ve owned the media forever via left-wing full-time journalists, but are now having to deal with competing megaphones - partly right-wingers who are blackballed from mostly left-wing newsrooms and in many cases part-timers who don’t feel like making journalism their full-time jobs.
Yes.
Should I be a victim of such a thing I'd look for a lawyer to sue these employees of the MSM.. and the Obama-Holder demagogues and the Sharpton race-grievance industry.
Traditional principles of vicarious liability include
Though associated with criminal law, these theories can be used to attribute fault to persons not directly related to an act that harmed a victim.
It must be proved that the others 'provided substantial assistance or encouragement' to those who did harm the victim.
In the SPLC suit against Tom Metzger and WAR the skinheads were not members of Metzger's WAR. But Metzger's rantings had influence over the mindless skinheads due to his reputation in the white supremacy movement
Tom Metzger recruited 16-year-old Mazzella and schooled him in the world of racist violence. Mazzella was sent to Portland to join up with and train the East Side White Pride [skinheads]. Members of that group later brutally murdered an innocent black man.
How is that any different that being "recruited" in college or by progressive ideologues?
The aiding and abetting theory fits because
Lawyers can invoke the aiding and abetting theory with relative ease. Invoking the aiding and abetting assumes two independent actors.
To prove an aiding and abetting claim
Civil conspiracy was also used and proved against the Metzgers because he had contacted the East Side White Pride skinheads and after the murder and their arrest one skinhead called Metzger from jail. Here civil conspiracy might be proved by any contacts between the criminals and Sharpton, Holder, Obama, et al.
Obviously I am not a lawyer and this is a kind of an outline of information available on the Internet. Why can't it be used against the "progressives" and racists of all colors?
Just think what would happen if someone got the addressees confused and posted those as Wilson’s new secret hideaway locations.
Bet these two leftist goons live in nice white communities where they don’t have to worry about being looted..someone should go to their house and help themselves to their goodies see how they like it
Payback is a b——.
Addresses are okay but coordinates are more efficient. The media is public enemy #1.
I saved their addresses just in case I finally snap and start hearing those voices again.
Send tip to Drudge.
Let it go viral.
How about the NYT execs and editors. Where do they live?
They allowed the original address to be published.
Ping
Well what do you know, they’re on my Christmas card list........
Good report and comments here on the Chicago Cop Blog:
Side Job Opportunity (UPDATE)
Quiet amusement is the feeling:
New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times so here are their addresses.
GotNews.com strenuously objects to publishing the addresses of individuals who are being targeted with death threats.
GotNews.com published the address of Ebola patient Nina Pham so that people could avoid going to her Dallas apartment.
But it would also be wrong to publish the addresses of journalists without their consent.
Of course, they go on to publish her address prominently on their page. We don’t understand what all the hubbub is about - she and her paper support the rioters and anarchists in Ferguson. Same team and all that. Now of course, she feels threatened:
The New York Times journalist who published Darren Wilson’s home address wants police protection and has been calling the police nonstop, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman “keeps calling the 020th District station complaining about people harassing and threatening her,” our source told us. She’s also “complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.”
Shouldn’t she be calling 9-1-1 instead of the 020 Desk? We mean, she isn’t special or anything, right? Just a reporter and all that? Police are just citizens - nothing special about a cop either. Absent an actual physical threat, 3-1-1 should be good enough, correct?
Now word comes in via e-mail that she’s looking for a “bodyguard” to save her from all those unwanted pizza and Chinese food deliveries. We would certainly hope that no one on the job would volunteer for this. The irony of this entire situation seems to escape the libs - fuck the police until you need the police.
Thinking about this, it might be a perfect opportunity to explore the ease and simplicity of getting a gun to protect yourself in Rahm’s Chicago. Then we can stop all these pesky murders once and for all committed by legal, law-abiding gun owners.
UPDATE: And the “journalist” has a police record:
The New York Times reporter who published Darren Wilson’s address and has been covering Michael Brown has a shoplifting record, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman and her co-author famously published Darren Wilson’s address in the New York Times page.
The apparent conflict of interest wasn’t disclosed to the New York Times, a source with knowledge in the inside of the Times has told Gotnews.com.
Why, you might ask, is a shoplifting arrest from when she was 17 relevant? Who knows....who cares? Officer Wilson’s home address wasn’t relevant either except to direct criminals to his residence. She failed to disclose a previous bias against the police and then “reported” on an event that affected the police. Sauce, goose, gander.
http://secondcitycop.blogspot.com/
Funny comments at Comment link