Yes.
Should I be a victim of such a thing I'd look for a lawyer to sue these employees of the MSM.. and the Obama-Holder demagogues and the Sharpton race-grievance industry.
Traditional principles of vicarious liability include
Though associated with criminal law, these theories can be used to attribute fault to persons not directly related to an act that harmed a victim.
It must be proved that the others 'provided substantial assistance or encouragement' to those who did harm the victim.
In the SPLC suit against Tom Metzger and WAR the skinheads were not members of Metzger's WAR. But Metzger's rantings had influence over the mindless skinheads due to his reputation in the white supremacy movement
Tom Metzger recruited 16-year-old Mazzella and schooled him in the world of racist violence. Mazzella was sent to Portland to join up with and train the East Side White Pride [skinheads]. Members of that group later brutally murdered an innocent black man.
How is that any different that being "recruited" in college or by progressive ideologues?
The aiding and abetting theory fits because
Lawyers can invoke the aiding and abetting theory with relative ease. Invoking the aiding and abetting assumes two independent actors.
To prove an aiding and abetting claim
Civil conspiracy was also used and proved against the Metzgers because he had contacted the East Side White Pride skinheads and after the murder and their arrest one skinhead called Metzger from jail. Here civil conspiracy might be proved by any contacts between the criminals and Sharpton, Holder, Obama, et al.
Obviously I am not a lawyer and this is a kind of an outline of information available on the Internet. Why can't it be used against the "progressives" and racists of all colors?
The SPLC victory in the vicarious liability suit against Tom Metzger looks like it does set a valid precedent if any threat is made to Darren Wilson. Darren Wilson could wind up owning a newspaper company.
Heheheh. we'll, you have some of the lingo down very well. And you might find a lawyer to take the case. But I guarantee you, at the end of the fight, you'd wish you hadn't played the court and lawyer's game. If the court isn't "rigged," you fight for damages and the lawyer gets to keep a good chunk of the award.
Court is for suckers.