[rodguy911]

It also pays to look back and see who conservatives ran in the primary to take out McConnell. Was he the best conservative candidate around? Was he well funded? was every conservative in KY behind him? Was everyone united. Did we really do the best job we could do in taking out McConnell. McConnell had national support and lots of money. Did we as a huge conservative base,with 30-50 million conservatives listening to talk radio and more on the blogosphere nationalize his race and make sure he was gone for good? It appears we didn't.

All good questions to be asked as to why McConnell is even around.

[bert]

The premise was flawed. The premise assumed that an incumbent in a major leadership role could be beaten in a primary

[cva66snipe]

It also pays to look back and see who conservatives ran in the primary to take out McConnell. Was he the best conservative candidate around? Was he well funded? was every conservative in KY behind him? Was everyone united. Did we really do the best job we could do in taking out McConnell. McConnell had national support and lots of money. Did we as a huge conservative base,with 30-50 million conservatives listening to talk radio and more on the blogosphere nationalize his race and make sure he was gone for good? It appears we didn't. All good questions to be asked as to why McConnell is even around.

The voters of Kentucky elected him their senator that's acceptable. But allowing him to be SML is not. It's a rub it in Conservatives faces by like ones that appear daily on Fox News calling themselves the voice of the GOP elected or otherwise. One handles lots and lots of Lobbyist money and has cost many a Conservative an election while in the Bush administration.