Shouldn’t you be posting all this to the people who DO compare it to Clinton, rather than those of us who don’t?
Cosby’s 16 or so rape victims who came forth are far more evidence than we had for Clinton’s rape.
Cosby’s out of court settlement with the 2005 accuser in which 13 more victims were willing to testify, is pretty damning in itself.
Your man looks guilt as all get out.
Are you saying that both Clinton and Cosby are rapists? Or that Clinton was convicted of rape (not true) based on flimsier evidence than has been presented by Cosby's accusers?
I think you misunderstood my post. I am trying to say that there has to be actual evidence other than a self-described victim saying "this is what happened" to convict anyone of anything, and that the Clinton and Cosby cases are not relevant to each other...
Cosby is not "my man". I don't know what will transpire next, but so far, we can not be sure he isn't being unjustly accused, and I'll wait and see before I make any judgments. That's all!