Are you saying that both Clinton and Cosby are rapists? Or that Clinton was convicted of rape (not true) based on flimsier evidence than has been presented by Cosby's accusers?
I think you misunderstood my post. I am trying to say that there has to be actual evidence other than a self-described victim saying "this is what happened" to convict anyone of anything, and that the Clinton and Cosby cases are not relevant to each other...
Cosby is not "my man". I don't know what will transpire next, but so far, we can not be sure he isn't being unjustly accused, and I'll wait and see before I make any judgments. That's all!
You are just babbling and posting confused nonsense.