1 posted on
11/20/2014 11:34:43 AM PST by
Bettyprob
To: Bettyprob
Our goal is to make damn sure that our legislature and governor follow our constitution, Randy Thompson, one of the landowners who is suing the Nebraska attorney general, said in an interview at his home outside of Lincoln, Neb. I'm 100% with you on that, brother.
I support construction of the pipeline, but the law must be followed.
2 posted on
11/20/2014 11:37:45 AM PST by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: Bettyprob
SO, Randy Johnson - who is affiliated with which party (and coached by the “energy consultant” for Obola’s White House) - is doing this to stop the pipeline, right?
3 posted on
11/20/2014 11:39:25 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Bettyprob
Eminent Domain as a concept is fine.
I would implement it at 2x market rates and fully acquire the property.
Lease it back at low rates if the guy still wants it.
4 posted on
11/20/2014 11:42:34 AM PST by
Uncle Miltie
('The HERO of the (0bamacare) story is Mitt Romney' - "Stupid" Jonathan Gruber)
To: Bettyprob
TransCanada to use the power of eminent domain The idea of a foreign company having the power of eminent domain over Americans' private property doesn't sit right with me, pipeline or no.
To: Bettyprob
They are building pipelines all over our area to hook up to the Barnett Shale wells. Granted they are not the diameter of the Keystone, but 6 months after they lay the pipe, you would not know it was there if it were not for signs on the fences.
I wish they would lay one across our place so maybe I could get a tap.
22 posted on
11/20/2014 12:02:14 PM PST by
Clay Moore
("911 is for when the backhoe won't start." JRandomFreeper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson