Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xone
The force of law supports the monarch.

No law, but arbitrary force supports the despot. That is the evolving Obama. It is no minor distinction.

FWIW, my points are from a guy to whom the Framers paid a lot of attention, Montesquieu.

31 posted on 11/20/2014 11:19:08 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

All hereditary lines had a beginning, no law but force enabled them. In that way, there is no difference. There is no legitimate line of kings in the western world. That people accepted the divine right of kings to rule over them speaks to a desire for security over freedom. As for Montesquieu, as a Frenchman he should know better considering the history of the monarchy and force in France.


34 posted on 11/20/2014 11:55:24 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson