Replies

You have really crossed the line.

You conclude as follows:

Jeff Sessions is a good, honest, principled man. It's a shame some people on this forum resort to such DESPICABLE TACTICS to advocate on his behalf. Hopefully he will win the post in spite of your ANTICS. (emphasis supplied)

I suppose you mean by my "antics" your allegations which appear above that I have, (1) "continuing to flat-out lie" about Mike and his record in office; (2) falsely claiming he's a liberal; (3) portraying Jeff Sessions as the sitting budget Committee Chairman

If you cannot document these charges you in decency should apologize.

No doubt you will fail to get around to doing either so I will note for the record that Jeff Sessions is the ranking member of the committee with which is a relevant fact that you are left out when you excoriated me for "distorting reality":

Nor is distorting the reality of the situation by portraying Sessions as the sitting Budget Committee Chairman and pretending that Enzi is trying to "strip" or "oust" Sessions from that job.

Let the reader consider whether lies of omission distort reality.

You are really contemptible.

>> You are really contemptible. <<

Coming from you, I wear that as a badge of honor.

Your smears where you:
1) continue to flat-out lie about Mike Enzi and his record in office;
2) falsely claim Mike Enzi is a liberal (repeatedly calling him a RINO, which stands for Republican In Name Only); and
3) portray Jeff Sessions as the sitting budget Committee Chairman

can be documented throughout this thread (and will remain on record for everyone to see, as long as the moderators don't delete your posts), as well as past threads where you advocated for Liz Cheney (who, unlike Enzi, DOES have proven liberal positions on major issues like gay marriage and amnesty) over Mike Enzi.

Furthermore, you originally made the topic of thread about how it would better to have Cheney than Enzi, before switching the argument to Sessions vs. Enzi when you were losing the debate.

I have nothing to apologize for, as the vast majority of posts on this thread confirm the facts I made about Enzi's record (which is far from RINOish) and the situation for Budget Committee Chairman (where there is NO Chairman to "oust", due to the outgoing Chairman being a Democrat) were correct.