Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

Agreed...as long as the “church” continues to dance with the State regarding marriage.

If the State thusly redefines marriage to be at odds with the church, then the church MUST necessarily ignore such redefinition...they should no longer request-and-maintain the political license to “marry”; rather the church IS REQUIRED to cease-and-desist from codifying any type of “marriage” that might satisfy and be in accord with the State requirements.

In the same manner, a church that confirms a 13-year-old child such that they may receive alcoholic beverages (communion wine), MUST assert their religious protection under 1-AM and...simply...move on.


20 posted on 11/15/2014 6:28:12 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel
In the same manner, a church ... MUST assert their religious protection under 1-AM and...simply...move on.

There will be no "moving on" in this evil age. The 1st Amendment is as good as dead thanks to "public accommodation" laws. EVERYTHING can be deemed a "public accommodation" in this new age of "enlightenment."

If the homos are offended by something, that is enough to get government to coerce action that will un-offend them.

26 posted on 11/15/2014 6:52:57 AM PST by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson