Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just what we need. More
big government
What's wrong with "if it ain't broke, don't fix it?" The Internet has existed for 30+ years without the gvt monkeying around with it. Why start now?

Same goes for Internet sales tax.

We all know that whatever the gvt touches turns to shit.

1 posted on 11/10/2014 1:49:18 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: upchuck

Let the NSA rule the net.


2 posted on 11/10/2014 1:51:50 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

FCC should stick to censoring superbowl clothing malfunctions and leave the internet alone.


3 posted on 11/10/2014 1:51:51 PM PST by ari-freedom (Obama is the biggest joke. But I can't laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Bruce Bartlett says Obama is a conservative President.

lolz


4 posted on 11/10/2014 1:52:03 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Hey Obama—Keep your hands off of my internet.


5 posted on 11/10/2014 1:52:27 PM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

The idiot is using “everyone” as a ploy to gain control for his own devise


6 posted on 11/10/2014 1:52:32 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Empty head empty suit happeneds when you have diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Manbearpig invented the net.


7 posted on 11/10/2014 1:52:47 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

It’s the Chicago mob.
Follow the money.
I’m sure there’s a regime affiliate or two standing to benefit here.


8 posted on 11/10/2014 1:53:16 PM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, Convict, Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Obama is a hardcore Socialist and desires to regulate everything, even your internet and favorite websites.


10 posted on 11/10/2014 1:53:52 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Then they surcharge it like the phone bill so the freeloaders can get free internet. Big government needs big money.


11 posted on 11/10/2014 1:54:14 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Reclassification under Title II, which for the first time would apply 1930s-era utility regulation to the Internet,


Just think about that. It’s not rhetorical...it’s truly that stupid.


12 posted on 11/10/2014 1:55:05 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck
President Obama urged the US government to adopt tighter regulations on broadband service in an effort to preserve "a free and open Internet."

That's just a bold-faced, Orwellian lie. "Free and open" is the exact opposite of what he wants, and "free and open" is the example opposite of what will result from "tighter regulations" on the Internet.

That's like saying you want to dump sand into a puddle to make it wetter and more liquid.

13 posted on 11/10/2014 1:56:42 PM PST by caligatrux (They always said that the living would envy the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

“We cannot allow broadband networks to cut special deals to prioritize Internet traffic...”


That’s how major functionality of the internet works. Without it, many parts of it don’t. ...pretty much anything involving real-time, or traffic shaping.


14 posted on 11/10/2014 1:57:47 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck
Is there anything that the A$$ wipe in chief doesn’t want to control?
15 posted on 11/10/2014 1:59:08 PM PST by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

In related news:
http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/boehner-kills-internet-sales-tax-bill/?dcz=

” Tax-free Internet shopping is safe for now thanks to Speaker John A. Boehner.

A bill granting states the ability to force out-of-state websites to collect sales tax is dead, according to Boehner’s spokesman.

“The speaker has made clear in the past he has significant concerns about the bill, and it won’t move forward this year,” said spokesman Kevin Smith. “The Judiciary Committee continues to examine the measure and the broader issue. In the meantime, the House and Senate should work together to extend the moratorium on internet taxation without further delay.”


16 posted on 11/10/2014 1:59:44 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck
He says the regulations are needed to make sure companies don't restrict best access and pick winners and losers.

Wow!! The gall of this guy in mind blowing!!
Talk about classic projection.
The truth is he wants to be the one restricting access and the one picking winners and losers.
Somebody needs to regulate the administration before it is too late.
If I were setting the GOP agenda the WH would be lucky to have hotel style toilet paper.
Their funding would be cut so bad that he might actually resign.
And he would have to buy his own commercial plane ticket home- wherever that is.

17 posted on 11/10/2014 1:59:45 PM PST by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Got to let the heavy hand of government “regulate” the internet to keep it free. Hoo boy. Ain’t totalitarianism grand.


18 posted on 11/10/2014 2:00:51 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

When you use a utility —let’s say power— you create public documents.

Lots of times they first spot pot growers by seeing the infra-red signature of equipment those guys use, but it’s legally a grey area.

Now they suspect what he’s doing, they then get his power bill, a public document, and if it’s SKY HIGH for, say, one person, then they can demonstrate reasonable suspicion, and they get a judge’s signature for a raid.

And then that guy goes away, surrenders cash and vehicles, maybe his house, too.

SO:

After you’ve been freeping and so on, it’s perfectly legal for them to see the details of your UTILITY USAGE, and presto..!

You’re a dangerous “terrorist”, or something.


20 posted on 11/10/2014 2:01:45 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Lack of competition is not what is hurting internet access in this country, regulatory pseudo-monopolies are the problem.

Going back to a system of so-called “natural monopolies” for broadband would make the situation a hundred times worse... unless you’re the CEO of Time-Warner.

This is simply crony capitalism at its best. Under this hair-brained idea, Obama’s furiously fellating friends over at the major media corporations would gain access to local monopolies, instead of having to compete with cable broadband providers, DSL providers, and wireless providers for lower rates and better speeds, your government would award an internet service provider monopoly to ONE provider in a given area — resulting in even higher prices, even lower quality of service, and enshrining Obama’s corporate sycophants in the media at the helm of monopolistic ISP control.


21 posted on 11/10/2014 2:04:29 PM PST by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck
The Internet has more or less evened the playing field that was once dominated by the Left/Marxists. They no longer control the flow of information the way they used to, so they want that control back. If Obama and the DemocRats are pushing for the FCC to regulate the Internet, you can bet that it won't be a good thing for freedom of speech and the free flow of information.
22 posted on 11/10/2014 2:07:12 PM PST by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

So it will work for everyone? Obola, what do you know about work?


23 posted on 11/10/2014 2:08:26 PM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson