[Praxeologue]

The last-mile monopoly that Comcast/Time-Warner/etc have effectively guts the argument of “letting the market decide”. If I want high speed internet service to my house, I have no choice - I must use Comcast and I have to pay the price they charge.

I don't see the need for this "Net Neutrality" legislation.

In my community, we have a choice of at least a dozen providers: cable, phone line, cellular network A, cellular network B, satellite service of the phone company, plus several other satellite services. Even in a remote rural area, you would have several of those options.

I don't see the need to tie down the providers, except, of course, to achieve state control over the Internet.

[combat_boots]

As was posted earlier, this is about getting Drudge and controlling conservative blogs.