Posted on 11/09/2014 8:38:25 PM PST by goldstategop
The more serious problem for Democrats is the drubbing theyve taken in the states, the breeding ground for future national talent and for policy experimentation. Republicans have unified control the governorship and the legislature in 23 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Democrats control just seven. Democrats hold 18 governorships, but only a handful are in the most populous states.
In California, Gov. Jerry Brown won again at age 76, his fourth, non-consecutive term in the governors office. His victory means that younger Democrats will have to wait until 2018 to compete for one of the nations most high-profile political jobs. In New York, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo won a second term, but cant get out of Clintons shadow. The only other state among the top 10 in population held by the Democrats is Pennsylvania, newly won by Tom Wolf.
Meanwhile, Republicans control governorships in Florida, Texas, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia and Massachusetts. Democrats were hoping to knock off Republicans Scott Walker in Wisconsin, Rick Scott in Florida and Rick Snyder in Michigan. All survived. In Ohio, John Kasich won by the second-largest margin in state history, thanks in part to the implosion of his Democratic opponent.
snip...
But a political party cannot be constructed around two individuals (Obama and Clinton), as Democrats seem to be today. Winning the presidency and taking back the Senate will be the Democrats top priorities in the next two years. The bigger challenge of rebuilding the party in the states and nurturing a new generation of leaders should be just as urgent.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Communist takeover of 1968 comes to mind.
The DEMOCRAT party, Dan, because there’s nothing democratic about it.
Yes.
And we must also do another important thing, impeach Leftist judges.
See my new tagline.
There’s nothing really boggling about it. Bush was an unpopular president, it’s very rare for one party to hold the White House for 3 terms, and Bush was the classic example of why. There was no way any GOP candidate was getting out of his shadow, so the dems were guaranteed the win in 08. For 12 you have to remember that America by and large like incumbents and usually gives presidents 2 terms, add to that a weak GOP field that eventually resulted in a nominee that nobody really liked and whose legislative record basically made it impossible for him to excite the base and it was another guaranteed win.
Meanwhile of course during midterms America generally hates the party of the sitting president. We forget that because 2 in a row (Clinton’s 2nd Bush’s 1st) the party gained, largely thanks to grossly misplayed hands by the opposition. Those were exceptions though, the rule is moderate losses for the 1st midterm and massive losses for the 2nd. It’s important to keep these trends in mind for the future, while we like to pat ourselves on the back and talk about how the dems are toast the reality is that 4 years from now it’s almost certainly going to be the GOP taking the beating, and again 4 years after that. It’s all actually very predictable, but we like to forget that this has a very set pattern.
They haven’t been in a similar position since the 1920s. They ran congress from 1948 to 1994.
The problem is the “Democrats” of today are really Bolsheviks.
By the way, had I mentioned that Maine....
So was the FDR bunch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.