Here is the link:
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/748675/gun-violencemessaging-guide-pdf-1.pdf
And the "Am I breaking the law I594" flow chart.
http://i.imgur.com/QLMj1Em.png
If they try to bring their ‘gun grabbing’ to Arizona they had better come armed to the teeth because we are.
DOH! Active linkage:
Messaging guide:
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/748675/gun-violencemessaging-guide-pdf-1.pdf
Flow chart for law breakers:
http://i.imgur.com/QLMj1Em.png
Just like the left. Beat up on their followers in liberal states. That crap won’t fly anywhere else.
Not a mental image I need, thanks. After 10 babies, if I never think about another behind again, it will be too soon.
Gosh! Is anyone surprised? BEEP!
This must be appealed.
It would seem, at least on the surface, that I-594 is unconstitutional.
I cannot believe this POC actually passed.
Effing liars.
Hopefully NRA and GOA will take this up in court.
And that will not be the end of it.
They can’t seriously believe that this law will reduce gun violence in any significant way.
We should repeal the 19th Amendment.
That’d solve 1/2 the problems in this country...
Since 1962 this has always been their goal, the total abolition of privately owned firearms.
“Sensible” gun law demands over the years...
And to think, in 1962 Thomas J Dodd and Emaual Cellar proposed the first federal law on common firearms.
1962; “We don’t want to take away your guns, we ONLY want to register handguns! Rifles and shotguns will not be affected”.
1964: “We only want to register all your guns, not ban them! Only Army surplus guns will be banned.”
1968: “We only want to register your guns, and ban “Saturday Night Specials” and small foreign handguns along with army surplus rifles!” (They got the ban on 5 shot army surplus rifles and handguns and small foreign pistols)
1970: “We only want to ban Saturday night specials! Large handguns and rifles will not be affected!”
1976: “We only want to ban all handguns! Long guns will not be affected!”
1981: “The NRA is a rifle organization! They should give up their handguns, and they can keep their rifles!”- Lee Grant on GMA
1984: “We must ban “assault Rifles, unsuitable or hunting!”
1989: George Bush bans import of some foreign made “assault rifles”.
1992: Assault rifle ban passed by Clinton.
2000: first calls to ban single shot .50 cal rifles...
More.......
Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.
“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.
Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.
So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.
My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.”
-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58
The Brady Center (former HCI) now has the hots to ban anything they can, including common rifles and shotguns.
WA PingInitiatives and ballot measures sponsored by liberals are never ...NEVER what they appear to be or what they are sold as being.
Most people know this going in.
No mine isn't (West Virginia) we don't even have a voter sponsored initiative process (not that it would pass anyway)....
I live in Washington state. There was no effective advertising against 594. I saw no ad stating the facts about the law, or the restrictions or the way it can turn a normal citizen into a lawbreaker or even a felon. There were MANY ads showing peoples faces that were killed by a person that had domestic abuse history and should not have had a weapon. Of course they never said that an accusation of domestic abuse does not have to be proven in court. Nor did they say whether the gun was purchased or loaned. It is a typical liberal law. It makes people feel good, but does not correct the problem (like laws make evil unable to to be perpetrated).
And just like every where they`ve tried this registration crap, they`ll be met with resistance and absolute refusal to comply. Let them get radical and it`s CWII. We are at that stage of the resistance, the Rats are for tyranny and the Crats are for tyranny, what choice do we have?
This isn’t even a law, it’s an invalid decree which is completely unConstitutional for one’s ownership of goods. We don’t need gov’t permission to buy, barter, or trade what we own. They can get stuffed.