No, as contrary to intuition as it seems, that actually is it: Black holes relate closely to timeframes and is one very rational way to reconcile the age of the earth with that of the universe. It’s quite mind-blowing, but the math works out.
I had developed and I thought, posted a response to you before this one. It linked in the PDF page from that site, and addressed that I had enjoyed the video so much I had watching the 1 of 2 in addition to the 2 of 2 you linked me to.
Here’s that guide again:
http://www.ctvn.org/the-programs/origins/episode-guide-origins/
There’s a lot of good information on that site. I bookmarked it.
Thank you very much, and sorry for the oversight of not posting what I developed in response to you.
BTW: The video you linked me to addressed the magnetic values of various heavenly bodies, the formulas for the original magnetic values for them based on mass and core denisity and how it decays over time.
It was a brilliant presentation making it crystal clear that there are valid reasons for establishing the age of the earth more in line with a 6,000 year age vs 14 billion years.
I found it compelling.
Coupled with observed changes in magnetic fields in recent decades, the science behind this is quite reasoned.