[Lexinom]

My own view is that the supernatural component must be presupposed a priori in order to provide a rational foundation for the very axioms on which scientific observation rests.

[freedumb2003]

Teas brillig..

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

My own view is that the supernatural component must be presupposed a priori

Your own particular version of a supernatural component, I imagine. But whatever you mean by it: let's say scientists do presuppose that. What are they supposed to do with that presupposition? How does it change their practice of science, or their reporting of their findings? Should they stop looking for an all-natural explanation at some point? How do they know where? Or do they keep looking and reporting but just make sure to mention God at some point in their papers?